You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by zentol <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/04/03 08:48:11 UTC

[GitHub] flink issue #5695: [FLINK-8704][tests] Port PartialConsumerPipelinedResultTe...

Github user zentol commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/5695
  
    IMO it is not a problem to have duplicate code for legacy/new code. Creating a base class is more effort that it is worth, as the legacy version will be removed again in 1.6 we would then have to merge the new version with the base class again.


---