You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/20 07:27:54 UTC
[jira] Created: (SOLR-1728) ResponseWriters should support byte[],
ByteBuffer
ResponseWriters should support byte[], ByteBuffer
-------------------------------------------------
Key: SOLR-1728
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Noble Paul
Priority: Minor
Only BinaryResponseWriter supports byte[] and ByteBuffer. Other writers also should support these
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (SOLR-1728) ResponseWriters should support byte[],
ByteBuffer
Posted by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Noble Paul updated SOLR-1728:
-----------------------------
Fix Version/s: 1.5
Assignee: Noble Paul
> ResponseWriters should support byte[], ByteBuffer
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Only BinaryResponseWriter supports byte[] and ByteBuffer. Other writers also should support these
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1728) ResponseWriters should support
byte[], ByteBuffer
Posted by "Noble Paul (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12805357#action_12805357 ]
Noble Paul commented on SOLR-1728:
----------------------------------
Everything works now in non-distributed search because , the BinaryField takes care of writing out the data as strings. In distributed search ,when the writers have to emit SolrDocument and if it contains byte[], XML, JSON and other response writers would do a toString() on the byte[].
> ResponseWriters should support byte[], ByteBuffer
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Only BinaryResponseWriter supports byte[] and ByteBuffer. Other writers also should support these
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1728) ResponseWriters should support
byte[], ByteBuffer
Posted by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12805578#action_12805578 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1728:
------------------------------------
Seems to make sense from a completeness point of view. It also allows a closer semantic mapping (i.e. we could use the closest equivalent to byte arrays for python & ruby).
> ResponseWriters should support byte[], ByteBuffer
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Only BinaryResponseWriter supports byte[] and ByteBuffer. Other writers also should support these
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (SOLR-1728) ResponseWriters should support
byte[], ByteBuffer
Posted by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12805291#action_12805291 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-1728:
--------------------------------
Noble: your issue description is a bit terse, so i'm a little confused.
Are you suggesting an API change such that binary write methods are added to QueryResponseWriter (making it equivalent to BinaryQueryResponseWriter) ?
Or are you suggesting that the existing classes which implement QueryResponseWriter ( JSONResponseWriter, PHPResponseWriter, PythonResponseWriter, XMLResponseWriter, etc...) should start implementing BinaryQueryResponseWriter?
In either case: what's the motivation?
> ResponseWriters should support byte[], ByteBuffer
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1728
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1728
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Noble Paul
> Assignee: Noble Paul
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 1.5
>
>
> Only BinaryResponseWriter supports byte[] and ByteBuffer. Other writers also should support these
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.