You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@rocketmq.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2021/05/28 09:46:40 UTC

[GitHub] [rocketmq] yglovewms opened a new issue #2957: how about using concurrenthashmap?

yglovewms opened a new issue #2957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/2957


   
   Why don't we use ConcurrentHashMap to solve the concurrency problem of modifying the hashmap but use a complex locking method.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] IntroDrop commented on issue #2957: how about using concurrenthashmap?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.

IntroDrop commented on issue #2957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/2957#issuecomment-850998896


   Can you give me an example？thanks


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org

[GitHub] [rocketmq] vongosling closed issue #2957: how about using concurrenthashmap?

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.

vongosling closed issue #2957:
URL: https://github.com/apache/rocketmq/issues/2957


   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org