You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Caleb Rackliffe (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/01/25 17:45:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-17292) Move cassandra.yaml toward a nested structure around major database concepts

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17292?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Caleb Rackliffe updated CASSANDRA-17292:
----------------------------------------
    Change Category: Operability
         Complexity: Normal
        Component/s: Local/Config
      Fix Version/s: 5.x
             Status: Open  (was: Triage Needed)

> Move cassandra.yaml toward a nested structure around major database concepts
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-17292
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-17292
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Local/Config
>            Reporter: Caleb Rackliffe
>            Assignee: Caleb Rackliffe
>            Priority: Normal
>             Fix For: 5.x
>
>
> Recent mailing list conversation (see "[DISCUSS] Nested YAML configs for new features") has made it clear we will gravitate toward appropriately nested structures for new parameters in {{cassandra.yaml}}, but from the scattered conversation across a few Guardrails tickets (see CASSANDRA-17212 and CASSANDRA-17148) and CASSANDRA-15234, there is also a general desire to eventually extend this to the rest of {{cassandra.yaml}}. The benefits of this change include those we gain by doing it for new features (single point of interest for feature documentation, typed configuration objects, logical grouping for additional parameters added over time, discoverability, etc.), but one a larger scale.
> This may overlap with ongoing work, including the Guardrails epic. Ideally, even a rough cut of a design here would allow that to move forward in a timely and coherent manner (with less long-term refactoring pain).
> While these would have to be adjusted to CASSANDRA-15234 (probably after it merges), there have been two proposals floated already for what this might look like:
> From [~maedhroz] - https://github.com/maedhroz/cassandra/commit/49e83c70eba3357978d1081ecf500bbbdee960d8
> From [~benedict] - https://github.com/belliottsmith/cassandra/commits/CASSANDRA-15234-grouping-ideas



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org