You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com> on 2012/11/20 00:28:53 UTC
development locations...again
Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have the
original):
http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find
successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page:
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
No Mac however. At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there
for consideration for "development" versions.
However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided for
Windows(?)
And, part 2, should we be testing these?
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
“How wrong is it for a woman to expect the man to build the world
she wants, rather than to create it herself?”
-- Anais Nin
Re: development locations...again
Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>
>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have the original):
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>>
>> Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page:
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>>
>> No Mac however.
>
> We're waiting for access to the Mac buildbot. The buildbot software has only recently been loaded on the current box - the older Mac slave turned out to be 'all dead'.
> Our build is a bit of a hog, and requires a bunch of prerequisites, so we have to be careful about not breaking the other projects on the box.
> That said, we do want a Mac bot and it is an open issue.
OK -- that would be good!
>
>
>> At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there for consideration for "development" versions.
>>
>> However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided for Windows(?)
>
> huhhh? Pretty sure full language set is built on L32 and L64.
> We are looking to down rev the Linux32 bot to Ubuntu 10.10 do that the install bits are linked against the right symbols, etc.
ok, they weren't explicitly linked on the page above and I didn't look
around. If they're available, I don't know who has karma to edit the
http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
page
>
>>
>> And, part 2, should we be testing these?
>
> sounds great. Actually, this was discussed during ApacheCon, and it is another of our long standing goals.
OK, good. Well, again, I was just wondering. I didn't know if there
were some "build" differences between the buildbot output and what's
provided via the developer links we have now. AND, of course, the QA
folks are using an older build as well.
Let's do it!
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
“How wrong is it for a woman to expect the man to build the world
she wants, rather than to create it herself?”
-- Anais Nin
Re: development locations...again
Posted by Jürgen Schmidt <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 11/20/12 1:16 AM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>>
>> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have
>>> the original):
>>>
>>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>>>
>>> Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find
>>> successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page:
>>>
>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>>>
>>> No Mac however.
>> We're waiting for access to the Mac buildbot. The buildbot software
>> has only recently been loaded on the current box - the older Mac slave
>> turned out to be 'all dead'.
>> Our build is a bit of a hog, and requires a bunch of prerequisites, so
>> we have to be careful about not breaking the other projects on the box.
>> That said, we do want a Mac bot and it is an open issue.
>>> At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there for
>>> consideration for "development" versions.
>>>
>>> However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided
>>> for Windows(?)
>> huhhh? Pretty sure full language set is built on L32 and L64.
> oh - en-US only. This is something to discuss - though not sure of the
> value of all languages on all platforms nightly. Perhaps we do all
> languages for all platforms for just the SNAPSHOT builds.
I agree en-US for the nightly builds is sufficient and all "released" +
planned languages for the snapshots
Juergen
>> We are looking to down rev the Linux32 bot to Ubuntu 10.10 do that the
>> install bits are linked against the right symbols, etc.
>>>
>>> And, part 2, should we be testing these?
>> sounds great. Actually, this was discussed during ApacheCon, and it
>> is another of our long standing goals.
>>
>
Re: development locations...again
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
>
> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have
>> the original):
>>
>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>>
>> Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find
>> successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page:
>>
>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>>
>> No Mac however.
> We're waiting for access to the Mac buildbot. The buildbot software
> has only recently been loaded on the current box - the older Mac slave
> turned out to be 'all dead'.
> Our build is a bit of a hog, and requires a bunch of prerequisites, so
> we have to be careful about not breaking the other projects on the box.
> That said, we do want a Mac bot and it is an open issue.
>> At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there for
>> consideration for "development" versions.
>>
>> However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided
>> for Windows(?)
> huhhh? Pretty sure full language set is built on L32 and L64.
oh - en-US only. This is something to discuss - though not sure of the
value of all languages on all platforms nightly. Perhaps we do all
languages for all platforms for just the SNAPSHOT builds.
> We are looking to down rev the Linux32 bot to Ubuntu 10.10 do that the
> install bits are linked against the right symbols, etc.
>>
>> And, part 2, should we be testing these?
> sounds great. Actually, this was discussed during ApacheCon, and it
> is another of our long standing goals.
>
Re: development locations...again
Posted by Andrew Rist <an...@oracle.com>.
On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have
> the original):
>
> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn
>
> Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find
> successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page:
>
> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/
>
> No Mac however.
We're waiting for access to the Mac buildbot. The buildbot software has
only recently been loaded on the current box - the older Mac slave
turned out to be 'all dead'.
Our build is a bit of a hog, and requires a bunch of prerequisites, so
we have to be careful about not breaking the other projects on the box.
That said, we do want a Mac bot and it is an open issue.
> At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there for
> consideration for "development" versions.
>
> However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided
> for Windows(?)
huhhh? Pretty sure full language set is built on L32 and L64.
We are looking to down rev the Linux32 bot to Ubuntu 10.10 do that the
install bits are linked against the right symbols, etc.
>
> And, part 2, should we be testing these?
sounds great. Actually, this was discussed during ApacheCon, and it is
another of our long standing goals.