You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk> on 2015/04/16 20:45:32 UTC
Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4 stuff) to master?
Hi folks
For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
*I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates to
existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the website;
will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should be
considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
production for a little while, at least.
If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you can
create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
~~~
Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
Thx
Dan
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4 stuff) to master?
Posted by GESCONSULTOR <o....@gesconsultor.com>.
Nice idea...
> El 16/4/2015, a las 21:06, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> escribió:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
> This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
> to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
> version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer, available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>>
>> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>>
>> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates to
>> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the website;
>> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>>
>> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should be
>> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
>> production for a little while, at least.
>>
>> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you can
>> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>>
>> Thx
>> Dan
>>
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4
stuff) to master?
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Using tag 'last-commit-before-DataNucleus4' didn't work because my app also
uses 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT of several Isis Addons.
Maven started failing with a cryptic error about
org.datanucleus.enhancer.PersistenceCapable. Running it with '-e' said that
this class could not be found.
At the top of the Maven logs for my -dom module I've noticed warnings for 4
Isis Addons - saying that their latest 1.9.0-timestamp version is invalid
or something similar. So I've started building them locally and I've
noticed that -audit and -command already have releases (1.8.2 and 1.8.1)
but -security and -sessionlogger didn't have such releases. So I've created
pre-DN4 tags for them too.
Now my app runs fine again with latest versions against DN3.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
> This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
> to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
> version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer, available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <dan@haywood-associates.co.uk
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>>
>> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>>
>> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates
>> to
>> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the
>> website;
>> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>>
>> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should
>> be
>> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
>> production for a little while, at least.
>>
>> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you
>> can
>> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>>
>> Thx
>> Dan
>>
>
>
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4
stuff) to master?
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Using tag 'last-commit-before-DataNucleus4' didn't work because my app also
uses 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT of several Isis Addons.
Maven started failing with a cryptic error about
org.datanucleus.enhancer.PersistenceCapable. Running it with '-e' said that
this class could not be found.
At the top of the Maven logs for my -dom module I've noticed warnings for 4
Isis Addons - saying that their latest 1.9.0-timestamp version is invalid
or something similar. So I've started building them locally and I've
noticed that -audit and -command already have releases (1.8.2 and 1.8.1)
but -security and -sessionlogger didn't have such releases. So I've created
pre-DN4 tags for them too.
Now my app runs fine again with latest versions against DN3.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
> This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
> to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
> version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer, available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <dan@haywood-associates.co.uk
> > wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>>
>> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>>
>> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates
>> to
>> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the
>> website;
>> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>>
>> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should
>> be
>> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
>> production for a little while, at least.
>>
>> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you
>> can
>> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>>
>> Thx
>> Dan
>>
>
>
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4 stuff) to master?
Posted by GESCONSULTOR <o....@gesconsultor.com>.
Nice idea...
> El 16/4/2015, a las 21:06, Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org> escribió:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
> This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
> to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
> version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Freelancer, available for hire!
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi folks
>>
>> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>>
>> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>>
>> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates to
>> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the website;
>> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>>
>> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should be
>> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
>> production for a little while, at least.
>>
>> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you can
>> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>>
>> ~~~
>> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>>
>> Thx
>> Dan
>>
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4
stuff) to master?
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi Dan,
Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer, available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>
> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>
> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates to
> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the website;
> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>
> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should be
> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
> production for a little while, at least.
>
> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you can
> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>
> ~~~
> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>
> Thx
> Dan
>
Re: Any objections to me merging in ISIS-789 (the DataNucleus 4
stuff) to master?
Posted by Martin Grigorov <mg...@apache.org>.
Hi Dan,
Let's create a tag, e.g. "pre-DN4" from current master.
This way everyone who faces any problem with DN4 and has no time/resources
to investigate the problems immediately will have the option to use this
version of ISIS until has more time/resources.
Martin Grigorov
Freelancer, available for hire!
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 9:45 PM, Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>
wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> For those running off -SNAPSHOT, this will impact you:
>
> *I'd like to merge in ISIS-789, the DataNucleus 4 stuff to master.*
>
> If you are running against -SNAPSHOT, it will require some minor updates to
> existing pom.xml files. (I intend to prepare an update doc on the website;
> will be in the 1.9.0 release notes).
>
> More importantly, though, this is a major upgrade of DN4 and, so, should be
> considered as quite high risk. I recommend that it is kept away from
> production for a little while, at least.
>
> If you are using -SNAPSHOT in production, my recommendation is that you can
> create a stable branch for yourself and build from that.
>
> ~~~
> Let me know ... will assume silent consensus.
>
> Thx
> Dan
>