You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@juneau.apache.org by James Bognar <ja...@apache.org> on 2017/09/06 00:14:33 UTC
[PROPOSE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating RC1
Hi everyone,
I'd like to create a new release of Juneau. I'd like to get the new
artifact structures in place as soon as possible. We've also got some
significant new functionality such as REST lifecycle hooks.
Changes can be seen here:
http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/site/apidocs/overview-summary.html#6.3.2
If I do not hear any objections within the next 72 hours, I'm going to go
ahead and start the process.
The release will be called 6.4.0-incubating-RC1. The next release will be
set to 6.4.1-incubating.
Also, I believe after this we may be in a good position to try to graduate
to a TLP. I think we should start the process after this release is
complete.
Re: [PROPOSE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating RC1
Posted by James Bognar <ja...@apache.org>.
Agreed that's messy. juneau-rest-test depends on juneau-microservice
(since it's the simplest way to get the REST server running to test
against).
How about if I add this artifact group?
juneau-microservice (Juneau Microservice artifact group)
- juneau-microservice-service
- juneau-microservice-template
- juneau-microservice-test (renamed from juneau-rest-test)
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 10:52 AM, David Goddard <go...@acm.org> wrote:
> Fine with me. I think the revised structure makes sense. My only qualm
> from a logical perspective is the inconsistency in Java version prereq
> within the Juneau REST category (6 for juneau-rest-* and 8 for
> juneau-microservice*). I know Jetty is the driving factor here, and
> there's not much that can be done other than either splitting microservice
> into a separate category or upping the Java prereq for juneau-rest-*, so on
> balance it's probably fine to leave as you have it.
>
>
> On 06/09/2017 02:14, James Bognar wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to create a new release of Juneau. I'd like to get the new
>> artifact structures in place as soon as possible. We've also got some
>> significant new functionality such as REST lifecycle hooks.
>>
>> Changes can be seen here:
>> http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/site/apidocs/overview-
>> summary.html#6.3.2
>>
>> If I do not hear any objections within the next 72 hours, I'm going to go
>> ahead and start the process.
>>
>> The release will be called 6.4.0-incubating-RC1. The next release will be
>> set to 6.4.1-incubating.
>>
>>
>> Also, I believe after this we may be in a good position to try to graduate
>> to a TLP. I think we should start the process after this release is
>> complete.
>>
>>
>
Re: [PROPOSE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating RC1
Posted by Steve Blackmon <sb...@apache.org>.
+1. It would be great to get recent work into a release.
Sent from Astro <https://www.helloastro.com> for Mac
On Sep 6, 2017 at 9:52 AM, David Goddard <go...@acm.org> wrote:
Fine with me. I think the revised structure makes sense. My only qualm
from a logical perspective is the inconsistency in Java version prereq
within the Juneau REST category (6 for juneau-rest-* and 8 for
juneau-microservice*). I know Jetty is the driving factor here, and
there's not much that can be done other than either splitting
microservice into a separate category or upping the Java prereq for
juneau-rest-*, so on balance it's probably fine to leave as you have it.
On 06/09/2017 02:14, James Bognar wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to create a new release of Juneau. I'd like to get the new
artifact structures in place as soon as possible. We've also got some
significant new functionality such as REST lifecycle hooks.
Changes can be seen here:
http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/site/apidocs/overview-summary.html#6.3.2
If I do not hear any objections within the next 72 hours, I'm going to go
ahead and start the process.
The release will be called 6.4.0-incubating-RC1. The next release will be
set to 6.4.1-incubating.
Also, I believe after this we may be in a good position to try to graduate
to a TLP. I think we should start the process after this release is
complete.
Re: [PROPOSE] Release Apache Juneau 6.4.0-incubating RC1
Posted by David Goddard <go...@acm.org>.
Fine with me. I think the revised structure makes sense. My only qualm
from a logical perspective is the inconsistency in Java version prereq
within the Juneau REST category (6 for juneau-rest-* and 8 for
juneau-microservice*). I know Jetty is the driving factor here, and
there's not much that can be done other than either splitting
microservice into a separate category or upping the Java prereq for
juneau-rest-*, so on balance it's probably fine to leave as you have it.
On 06/09/2017 02:14, James Bognar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to create a new release of Juneau. I'd like to get the new
> artifact structures in place as soon as possible. We've also got some
> significant new functionality such as REST lifecycle hooks.
>
> Changes can be seen here:
> http://juneau.incubator.apache.org/site/apidocs/overview-summary.html#6.3.2
>
> If I do not hear any objections within the next 72 hours, I'm going to go
> ahead and start the process.
>
> The release will be called 6.4.0-incubating-RC1. The next release will be
> set to 6.4.1-incubating.
>
>
> Also, I believe after this we may be in a good position to try to graduate
> to a TLP. I think we should start the process after this release is
> complete.
>