Re: replacing jgroups 2.2.9

[theseusyang <th...@gmail.com>]

Hi Bruce,

Now Raft Consensus protocol is going popular in some distributed system,
like etcd, Kubernetes..
We can also consider using Raft to replace directly JGroups protocol, but
according to https://github.com/belaban/jgroups-raft

belaban say that it still have some issues, in using JGroups as basis for a
RAFT impl, unstable until now.







--
View this message in context: http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/replacing-jgroups-2-2-9-tp446p6514.html
Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: replacing jgroups 2.2.9

[Bruce Schuchardt <bs...@pivotal.io>]

Thanks Theseus - I wasn't aware that Bela Ban was working on a Raft 
implementation.  That's cool.

There's quite a bit in Geode that is architected on the notion of an 
ordered membership view, so I'm not sure Raft would be a good 
replacement for the GMS.  I've considered it as a replacement for our 
consistency model, probably based in the DistributionAdvisors that are 
attached to cache Regions.


Le 6/8/2016  8:32 PM, theseusyang a crit :
> Hi Bruce,
>
> Now Raft Consensus protocol is going popular in some distributed system,
> like etcd, Kubernetes..
> We can also consider using Raft to replace directly JGroups protocol, but
> according to https://github.com/belaban/jgroups-raft
>
> belaban say that it still have some issues, in using JGroups as basis for a
> RAFT impl, unstable until now.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-geode-incubating-developers-forum.70738.x6.nabble.com/replacing-jgroups-2-2-9-tp446p6514.html
> Sent from the Apache Geode (Incubating) Developers Forum mailing list archive at Nabble.com.