You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com> on 2013/03/21 10:31:36 UTC
Using Solr from Github or SVN
I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code with
Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that they
are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that if
there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
much better cos of merging easiness?
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
Committers mostly use ant+ivy, so that will most likely be more stable. Both Eclipse and IDEA are frequently in use by committers so both are safe choices.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
21. mars 2013 kl. 11:10 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
> How about deciding on Maven or Ant + Ivy. On the other hand I need another
> suggestion whether using Eclipse or Intellij IDEA. What developers use in
> common?
>
> 2013/3/21 Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
>
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>>
>> Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to
>> you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd
>> generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you
>> want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
>>
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>>
>> 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
>>> custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code
>> with
>>> Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that
>> they
>>> are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that
>> if
>>> there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
>>> much better cos of merging easiness?
>>
>>
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>.
How about deciding on Maven or Ant + Ivy. On the other hand I need another
suggestion whether using Eclipse or Intellij IDEA. What developers use in
common?
2013/3/21 Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>
> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>
> Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to
> you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd
> generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you
> want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
> > custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code
> with
> > Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that
> they
> > are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that
> if
> > there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
> > much better cos of merging easiness?
>
>
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
I read "Generate Patch" section and saw no Git mention. Did not read
"Working.." section as I did not expect to need it any time soon.
It is good to know.
Regards,
Alex.
Personal blog: http://blog.outerthoughts.com/
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alexandrerafalovitch
- Time is the quality of nature that keeps events from happening all at
once. Lately, it doesn't seem to be working. (Anonymous - via GTD book)
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:56 AM, Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> If you read the HowToContribute page you will see it described there. I's
> supported, you just need to apply the patch with -p1 instead of -p0
> http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Working_With_Patches
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> 21. mars 2013 kl. 12:40 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I thought git patch format was different from svn's. Would that cause
> > issues?
> >
> > Regard,
> > Alex
> > On 21 Mar 2013 05:53, "Jan Høydahl" <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> >
> >> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
> >>
> >> Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to
> >> you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back,
> you'd
> >> generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you
> >> want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> >> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> >> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
> >>
> >> 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
> >>> custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code
> >> with
> >>> Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that
> >> they
> >>> are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think
> that
> >> if
> >>> there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
> >>> much better cos of merging easiness?
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
If you read the HowToContribute page you will see it described there. I's supported, you just need to apply the patch with -p1 instead of -p0 http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute#Working_With_Patches
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
21. mars 2013 kl. 12:40 skrev Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>:
> I thought git patch format was different from svn's. Would that cause
> issues?
>
> Regard,
> Alex
> On 21 Mar 2013 05:53, "Jan Høydahl" <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
>
>> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>>
>> Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to
>> you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd
>> generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you
>> want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
>>
>> --
>> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
>> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
>> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>>
>> 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
>>> custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code
>> with
>>> Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that
>> they
>>> are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that
>> if
>>> there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
>>> much better cos of merging easiness?
>>
>>
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Alexandre Rafalovitch <ar...@gmail.com>.
I thought git patch format was different from svn's. Would that cause
issues?
Regard,
Alex
On 21 Mar 2013 05:53, "Jan Høydahl" <ja...@cominvent.com> wrote:
> See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
>
> Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to
> you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd
> generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you
> want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
>
> --
> Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
> Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
> Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
>
> 21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
>
> > I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
> > custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code
> with
> > Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that
> they
> > are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that
> if
> > there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
> > much better cos of merging easiness?
>
>
Re: Using Solr from Github or SVN
Posted by Jan Høydahl <ja...@cominvent.com>.
See http://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute
Whether you choose to work locally with a GIT checkout or SVN is up to you. At the end of the day, when you want to contribute stuff back, you'd generate a patch and attach it to JIRA. SVN is the main repo, so if you want to be 100% in sync, choose the official SVN.
--
Jan Høydahl, search solution architect
Cominvent AS - www.cominvent.com
Solr Training - www.solrtraining.com
21. mars 2013 kl. 10:31 skrev Furkan KAMACI <fu...@gmail.com>:
> I want to branch Solr (latest version) at my local and implement some
> custom codes. After some time(maybe every month) I will merge my code with
> Solr. However There is code at SVN and Github for Solr and I see that they
> are not exactly synchronous. Which one do you suggest, do you think that if
> there is no time delay between SVN and Github repositories using Git is
> much better cos of merging easiness?