You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/12/02 17:01:28 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32496] New: -
Converters should really be final?
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG�
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32496>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND�
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32496
Summary: Converters should really be final?
Product: Commons
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Bean Utilities
AssignedTo: commons-dev@jakarta.apache.org
ReportedBy: daniel.amadei@click21.com.br
Hi!
I'm using BeanUtils to copy properties from one bean to another. When it copies
from String to boolean it should know that S means true ('sim' = 'yes' in
portuguese) and N means false ('n�o' = 'no' in portuguese).
So I was wondering to extend the BooleanConverter to use the existing
functionality adding one more check as specified above but it's not possible. I
don't want to recompile the entire bean-utils package as I want to be free to
upgrade to new releases without worry. And I don't want to do what I'm doing
now: I copied the entire BeanConverter logic, adding the new chars to the If
statement.
So what I'm asking to remove the final qualifier from the converter classes so
they can be subclassed.
If needed I can create the patches, just let me know.
Daniel
--
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org