You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by damonsmith <da...@larrymite.com.au> on 2006/05/08 17:13:08 UTC
RE: f:param and commandButton
I've just tried using an updateActionListener tag inside a commandLink tag,
as it sounds like a brilliant solution, but I get an error saying that the
parent tag (the HtmlCommandLink object) is not an instance of
EditableValueHolder.
I'm using the current release versions of myfaces-1.1.2 and tomahawk 1.1.1.
Is anyone else getting this problem? Could this be a version issue?
any help appreciated,
Damon Smith
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/f%3Aparam-and-commandButton-t1517965.html#a4282395
Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.
Re: f:param and commandButton
Posted by Mert Çalışkan <mc...@gmail.com>.
IBM RSA doesn't support it yet..lol :)))
1.5 has lots of nifty features and I agree about using it too.
Regards,
Mert
On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Yep, sorry, I work exclusively on Tiger/Java5/JDK 1.5 (whatever you
> want to call it). I use generics, enum's and the new for loop a lot.
> Good for me, maybe not so good for people who can't upgrade to it yet.
> Makes me wonder what percentage of people are still on 1.4...
>
> On 5/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have released that tomahawk tag handler in component form at:
> > >
> > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsf-comp/
> > >
> > > Download the tagHandlers release:
> > >
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137466&package_id=168411&release_id=368243
> >
> > Hey Andrew.
> >
> > I started using your handler about a week ago. One thing I noticed
> > was that it seemed to have some unnecessary Java 1.5? code in it.
> >
> > I changed
> >
> > ================
> > for (ActionListener listener : source.getActionListeners
> ())
> > {
> > ================
> >
> > to
> >
> > ================
> > ActionListener actionListeners[] = source.getActionListeners
> ();
> > for (int index = 0; index < actionListeners.length;
> ++index)
> > {
> > ActionListener listener = actionListeners[index];
> > ================
> >
> > and it has been running great for me under Java 1.4.2.
> >
>
Re: f:param and commandButton
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
Yep, sorry, I work exclusively on Tiger/Java5/JDK 1.5 (whatever you
want to call it). I use generics, enum's and the new for loop a lot.
Good for me, maybe not so good for people who can't upgrade to it yet.
Makes me wonder what percentage of people are still on 1.4...
On 5/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have released that tomahawk tag handler in component form at:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsf-comp/
> >
> > Download the tagHandlers release:
> > http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137466&package_id=168411&release_id=368243
>
> Hey Andrew.
>
> I started using your handler about a week ago. One thing I noticed
> was that it seemed to have some unnecessary Java 1.5? code in it.
>
> I changed
>
> ================
> for (ActionListener listener : source.getActionListeners())
> {
> ================
>
> to
>
> ================
> ActionListener actionListeners[] = source.getActionListeners();
> for (int index = 0; index < actionListeners.length; ++index)
> {
> ActionListener listener = actionListeners[index];
> ================
>
> and it has been running great for me under Java 1.4.2.
>
Re: f:param and commandButton
Posted by Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>.
On 5/9/06, Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have released that tomahawk tag handler in component form at:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsf-comp/
>
> Download the tagHandlers release:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137466&package_id=168411&release_id=368243
Hey Andrew.
I started using your handler about a week ago. One thing I noticed
was that it seemed to have some unnecessary Java 1.5? code in it.
I changed
================
for (ActionListener listener : source.getActionListeners())
{
================
to
================
ActionListener actionListeners[] = source.getActionListeners();
for (int index = 0; index < actionListeners.length; ++index)
{
ActionListener listener = actionListeners[index];
================
and it has been running great for me under Java 1.4.2.
Re: f:param and commandButton
Posted by Andrew Robinson <an...@gmail.com>.
I have released that tomahawk tag handler in component form at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/jsf-comp/
Download the tagHandlers release:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=137466&package_id=168411&release_id=368243
It will be more up to date than the one I made for my Church and
posted (bethanyefree).
-Andrew
On 5/9/06, damonsmith <da...@larrymite.com.au> wrote:
>
> I found the issue, and just in case anyone is googling for it, it's because
> I'm using Facelets as my ViewHandler, not JSP files. Apparently Facelets
> handles assigning values like this differently, and the only solution I
> could find was to use a different component implementation of
> updateActionListener.
>
> I found one called
> org.bethanyefree.taghandlers.TomahawkUpdateActionListenerHandler.java
> which I've added to my custom tag namespace as an updateActionListener tag,
> and it does the job. It does throw an error message which I haven't
> properly investigated, but it appears to work properly.
>
> There is some info about the differences here:
> https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html#taglib-create-component
>
> Any extra info on this issue would still be greatly appreciated.
>
> cheers,
>
> Damon Smith
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/f%3Aparam-and-commandButton-t1517965.html#a4302679
> Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.
>
>
RE: f:param and commandButton
Posted by damonsmith <da...@larrymite.com.au>.
I found the issue, and just in case anyone is googling for it, it's because
I'm using Facelets as my ViewHandler, not JSP files. Apparently Facelets
handles assigning values like this differently, and the only solution I
could find was to use a different component implementation of
updateActionListener.
I found one called
org.bethanyefree.taghandlers.TomahawkUpdateActionListenerHandler.java
which I've added to my custom tag namespace as an updateActionListener tag,
and it does the job. It does throw an error message which I haven't
properly investigated, but it appears to work properly.
There is some info about the differences here:
https://facelets.dev.java.net/nonav/docs/dev/docbook.html#taglib-create-component
Any extra info on this issue would still be greatly appreciated.
cheers,
Damon Smith
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/f%3Aparam-and-commandButton-t1517965.html#a4302679
Sent from the MyFaces - Users forum at Nabble.com.