You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@continuum.apache.org by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com> on 2008/03/13 12:39:08 UTC
Board report review
Hi,
We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
eventually add more things?
================
This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
last month.
Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
The web site has moved to its final location (http://continuum.apache.org).
The svn repo has moved to its final location
(http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
The mailing lists has been moved too.
We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified for"
such a purpose.
================
Thanks.
Emmanuel
Re: Board report review
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
On 14/03/2008, at 10:12 AM, Rahul Thakur wrote:
> +1, no additions.
>
> How frequently are reports submitted with the Board?
monthly for the first 3 months, then quarterly after that.
>
>
> Rahul
>
>
> Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
>> eventually add more things?
>>
>> ================
>> This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
>> last month.
>>
>> Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
>> The web site has moved to its final location (http://continuum.apache.org
>> ).
>> The svn repo has moved to its final location
>> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
>> The mailing lists has been moved too.
>>
>> We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
>> Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
>>
>> About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
>> has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
>> since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
>> definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
>> cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified
>> for"
>> such a purpose.
>>
>> ================
>>
>> Thanks.
>> Emmanuel
>>
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: Board report review
Posted by Rahul Thakur <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1, no additions.
How frequently are reports submitted with the Board?
Rahul
Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
> eventually add more things?
>
> ================
> This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
> last month.
>
> Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
> The web site has moved to its final location (http://continuum.apache.org).
> The svn repo has moved to its final location
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
> The mailing lists has been moved too.
>
> We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
> Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
>
> About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
> since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
> definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
> cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified for"
> such a purpose.
>
> ================
>
> Thanks.
> Emmanuel
>
Re: Board report review
Posted by Jesse McConnell <je...@gmail.com>.
+1 looks good :)
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> sounds good - nothing to add from me.
>
> On 13/03/2008, at 10:39 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
> > eventually add more things?
> >
> > ================
> > This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
> > last month.
> >
> > Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
> > The web site has moved to its final location (
> http://continuum.apache.org
> > ).
> > The svn repo has moved to its final location
> > (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
> > The mailing lists has been moved too.
> >
> > We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
> > Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
> >
> > About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> > has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
> > since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
> > definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
> > cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified
> > for"
> > such a purpose.
> >
> > ================
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Emmanuel
>
> --
> Brett Porter
> brett@apache.org
> http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
>
>
--
jesse mcconnell
jesse.mcconnell@gmail.com
Re: Board report review
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
sounds good - nothing to add from me.
On 13/03/2008, at 10:39 PM, Emmanuel Venisse wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
> eventually add more things?
>
> ================
> This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
> last month.
>
> Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
> The web site has moved to its final location (http://continuum.apache.org
> ).
> The svn repo has moved to its final location
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
> The mailing lists has been moved too.
>
> We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
> Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
>
> About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
> since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
> definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
> cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified
> for"
> such a purpose.
>
> ================
>
> Thanks.
> Emmanuel
--
Brett Porter
brett@apache.org
http://blogs.exist.com/bporter/
Re: Board report review
Posted by Olivier Lamy <ol...@apache.org>.
fine.
--
Olivier
2008/3/13, Emmanuel Venisse <em...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> We must send the board report for this weekend. Can you review it and
> eventually add more things?
>
> ================
> This report for March is the first report since Continuum graduation
> last month.
>
> Continuum resources have been completely moved out of the Maven area.
> The web site has moved to its final location (http://continuum.apache.org).
> The svn repo has moved to its final location
> (http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/continuum/).
> The mailing lists has been moved too.
>
> We are currently working on Continuum 1.2, which isn't planned yet.
> Discussions are started about the next major version (2.0).
>
> About cryptography, a review of http://www.apache.org/dev/crypto.html
> has determined that Continuum does not have any reporting obligations
> since it does not contain any cryptographic code under the ECCN 5D002
> definition. Although Continuum might be used by developers with
> cryptographic libraries, it is not "specially designed or modified for"
> such a purpose.
>
> ================
>
> Thanks.
>
> Emmanuel
>