You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Maurice Lucas <ms...@taos-it.nl> on 2006/12/01 16:03:48 UTC
Problems with one ham message
Hello,
I have the default scores for all the tests below and doesn't know where
the score comes from.
Could somebody help?
2006-12-01 15:33:51.100434500 [5834] info: spamd: connection from
capella.taos-it.nl [127.0.0.1] at port 51166
2006-12-01 15:33:51.152649500 [5834] info: spamd: processing message
<6....@mail5.FQDN> for spamd:1031
2006-12-01 15:33:55.571287500 [5834] info: spamd: identified spam
(8.9/5.5) for spamd:1031 in 4.5 seconds, 888 bytes.
Score is 8.9 with required 5.5
2006-12-01 15:33:55.571562500 [5834] info: spamd: result: Y 8 -
AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
The tests
scantime=4.5,size=888,user=spamd,uid=1031,required_score=5.5,rhost=capella.taos-it.nl,
raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=51166,mid=<6....@mail5.FQDN>,bayes=5.55111512312578e-17,autolearn=no
If I run dis message with spamassassin -t <msg then the result is.
Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.5 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some
mails
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
So why is it in the smtp fase rejected as spam?
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT
Re: Problems with one ham message
Posted by Maurice Lucas <ms...@taos-it.nl>.
Never mind. I needed more coffee
AWL score was the reason
On Fri, 2006-12-01 at 16:03 +0100, Maurice Lucas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have the default scores for all the tests below and doesn't know where
> the score comes from.
> Could somebody help?
>
>
> 2006-12-01 15:33:51.100434500 [5834] info: spamd: connection from
> capella.taos-it.nl [127.0.0.1] at port 51166
> 2006-12-01 15:33:51.152649500 [5834] info: spamd: processing message
> <6....@mail5.FQDN> for spamd:1031
> 2006-12-01 15:33:55.571287500 [5834] info: spamd: identified spam
> (8.9/5.5) for spamd:1031 in 4.5 seconds, 888 bytes.
> Score is 8.9 with required 5.5
>
>
> 2006-12-01 15:33:55.571562500 [5834] info: spamd: result: Y 8 -
> AWL,BAYES_00,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,FORGED_RCVD_HELO
> The tests
>
> scantime=4.5,size=888,user=spamd,uid=1031,required_score=5.5,rhost=capella.taos-it.nl,
> raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=51166,mid=<6....@mail5.FQDN>,bayes=5.55111512312578e-17,autolearn=no
>
> If I run dis message with spamassassin -t <msg then the result is.
> Content analysis details: (-2.5 points, 5.5 required)
>
> pts rule name description
> ---- ----------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> 0.1 FORGED_RCVD_HELO Received: contains a forged HELO
> 0.0 DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME Domain Keys: policy says domain signs some
> mails
> -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
> [score: 0.0000]
>
> So why is it in the smtp fase rejected as spam?
>
>
--
With kind regards,
Maurice Lucas
TAOS-IT