You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to proton@qpid.apache.org by Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu> on 2012/10/26 02:38:04 UTC
RC6
I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
properly. That's the only change from RC5.
[1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
--Rafael
Re: RC6
Posted by "Darryl L. Pierce" <dp...@redhat.com>.
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 08:38:04PM -0400, Rafael Schloming wrote:
> I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
> properly. That's the only change from RC5.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
Packages build fine locally (F17 x86_64).
Scratch build in Koji [1] was successful as well.
[1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4628740
--
Darryl L. Pierce, Sr. Software Engineer @ Red Hat, Inc.
Delivering value year after year.
Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
Re: RC6
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell
<ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
> and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
> KEYS file for example.
>
> (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
> and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> https://people.apache.org/keys/).
>
Sorry I haven't looked at this stuff for a while now, so wasn't aware
about the new mechanism.
The existing KEYS file was inside the qpid tree, hence my suggestion.
Actually a better suggestion would have been to move that file to the top level.
But anyways, given that we have a new system in place it's irrelevant now.
We should make an attempt to use the new approach.
Rajith
> Robbie
>
> On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
>> We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
>> Please look at the RAT output I posted.
>>
>> Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
>> will have to sign the final artefacts.
>> You already have your key listed here [1]
>> We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Rajith
>>
>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>
>> wrote:
>> > I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
>> > properly. That's the only change from RC5.
>> >
>> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
>> >
>> > --Rafael
>>
Re: RC6
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
I have forwarded you (and the pmc) the original email from committers@ with
the details.
Robbie
On 26 October 2012 14:48, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Do you know how I get my key to show up there?
>
> --Rafael
>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemmell@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
> > and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
> > KEYS file for example.
> >
> > (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file
> anyway
> > and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> > https://people.apache.org/keys/).
> >
> > Robbie
> >
> > On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
> > > We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license
> headers.
> > > Please look at the RAT output I posted.
> > >
> > > Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
> > > will have to sign the final artefacts.
> > > You already have your key listed here [1]
> > > We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Rajith
> > >
> > > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests
> skip
> > > > properly. That's the only change from RC5.
> > > >
> > > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
> > > >
> > > > --Rafael
> > >
> >
>
Re: RC6
Posted by Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>.
Do you know how I get my key to show up there?
--Rafael
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
> and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
> KEYS file for example.
>
> (Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
> and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
> https://people.apache.org/keys/).
>
> Robbie
>
> On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
> > We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
> > Please look at the RAT output I posted.
> >
> > Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
> > will have to sign the final artefacts.
> > You already have your key listed here [1]
> > We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rajith
> >
> > [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>
> > wrote:
> > > I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
> > > properly. That's the only change from RC5.
> > >
> > > [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
> > >
> > > --Rafael
> >
>
Re: RC6
Posted by Robbie Gemmell <ro...@gmail.com>.
I dont think KEYS should be proton specific, its just the Qpid committers
and should be the same file as a result. Commons-* seem to use the same
KEYS file for example.
(Aside: we should probably be transitioning away from the KEYS file anyway
and using the new system they put in place for distribution via
https://people.apache.org/keys/).
Robbie
On 26 October 2012 02:05, Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
> We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
> Please look at the RAT output I posted.
>
> Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
> will have to sign the final artefacts.
> You already have your key listed here [1]
> We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajith
>
> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>
> wrote:
> > I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
> > properly. That's the only change from RC5.
> >
> > [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
> >
> > --Rafael
>
Re: RC6
Posted by Rajith Attapattu <ra...@gmail.com>.
Sorry I should have done this before you posted RC6 :(
We have a few files (mostly java files) that are missing license headers.
Please look at the RAT output I posted.
Once the final RC is voted, the release manager (in this case Rafi)
will have to sign the final artefacts.
You already have your key listed here [1]
We should move [1] under the proton main dir.
Regards,
Rajith
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/qpid/trunk/qpid/KEYS
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I put up an RC6 here[1] with the java shim fixed so the SSL tests skip
> properly. That's the only change from RC5.
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~rhs/qpid-proton-0.1rc6/
>
> --Rafael