You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Hudson (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/12/02 07:03:13 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-11341) KMS support for whitelist key
ACLs
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14231047#comment-14231047 ]
Hudson commented on HADOOP-11341:
---------------------------------
FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-trunk-Commit #6626 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-trunk-Commit/6626/])
HADOOP-11341. KMS support for whitelist key ACLs. Contributed by Arun Suresh. (wang: rev 31b4d2daa14a7f6e8ee73fd3160e126d8db62ffb)
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/kms/server/KMSConfiguration.java
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/kms/server/KMSACLs.java
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms/src/site/apt/index.apt.vm
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/CHANGES.txt
* hadoop-common-project/hadoop-kms/src/test/java/org/apache/hadoop/crypto/key/kms/server/TestKMS.java
> KMS support for whitelist key ACLs
> ----------------------------------
>
> Key: HADOOP-11341
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-11341
> Project: Hadoop Common
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: kms, security
> Reporter: Arun Suresh
> Assignee: Arun Suresh
> Fix For: 2.7.0
>
> Attachments: HADOOP-11341.1.patch, HADOOP-11341.2.patch, HADOOP-11341.3.patch, HADOOP-11341.4.patch
>
>
> As reported by [~dian.fu] :
> Key based ACL in KMS is currently implemented as whitelist. So if I configure as follows in kms-acl.xml,
> {code}
> <property>
> <name>key.acl.testKey.DECRYPT_EEK</name>
> <value>testUser</value>
> </property>
> {code}, then only {{testUser}} user can do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} call on key {{testKey}}. If I want {{yarn}} user can also do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} call on {{testKey}} key, I need add {{yarn}} user to the above configuration value manually. This means that if I want to configure key based ACL({{DECRYPT_EEK}}) for {{some key}}, I need also add {{yarn}} user to configuration {{DECRYPT_EEK}} for that key. As I don't know if {{yarn}} user will later need to do {{DECRYPT_EEK}} for this key.. This is inconvenient and tricky.
> This can be alleviated by slightly modifying the key ACL logic in KMS first checks if the user, in this case {{yarn}}, is present in {{key.acl.<key-name>.<OP-name>}} list. And if not, then also check if the user is present in {{default.key.acl.<OP-name>}}. If yes, then grant access.. else deny.
> Currently, {{default.key.acl.<OP-name>}} is consulted only if NO {{key.acl.<key-name>.<OP-name>}} is specified.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)