You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jeff Jirsa (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/11/10 18:38:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-14008) RTs at index boundaries in 2.x
sstables can create unexpected CQL row in 3.x
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14008?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Jeff Jirsa updated CASSANDRA-14008:
-----------------------------------
Summary: RTs at index boundaries in 2.x sstables can create unexpected CQL row in 3.x (was: RTs at index boundaries in 2.x sstables create unexpected CQL row in 3.x)
> RTs at index boundaries in 2.x sstables can create unexpected CQL row in 3.x
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-14008
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-14008
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Jeff Jirsa
> Assignee: Jeff Jirsa
> Labels: correctness
> Fix For: 3.0.x, 3.11.x
>
>
> In 2.1/2.2, it is possible for a range tombstone that isn't a row deletion and isn't a complex deletion to appear between two cells with the same clustering. The 8099 legacy code incorrectly treats the two (non-RT) cells as two distinct CQL rows, despite having the same clustering prefix.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commits-help@cassandra.apache.org