You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@kafka.apache.org by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io> on 2021/02/08 19:10:18 UTC
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Hey all,
Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to the 2.6
branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always, please
let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect 2.6
Thanks!
Sophie
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org> wrote:
> Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
>
> I'm +1
>
> -John
>
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> sophie@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release. This is
> > > being
> > > > accelerated
> > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows users.
> > > >
> > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Sophie
> > > >
> > >
>
>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Sophie. Commits for all 3 issues mentioned earlier have been
backported to the `2.6` branch.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 2:08 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Thanks Randall. I think all three of those seem important and should be
> merged back to the 2.6 branch.
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:01 AM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi, Sophie.
> >
> > I have three new blockers related to a previous fix applied since 2.6.1
> > that I'd like to merge to the 2.6 branch:
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12340 -- potential
> resource
> > leak for Kafka*BackingStores used in Connect; PR is already approved and
> in
> > trunk
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12339 -- may cause Connect
> > worker to fail upon creation of internal topic (race condition); PR will
> > likely be approved shortly
> > * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12343 -- Connect fails to
> > read internal topics on AK 0.10.x; PR will likely be approved shortly
> >
> > Please let me know if it's okay to merge these to the 2.6 branch for
> > inclusion in 2.6.2. Thanks!
> >
> > Randall
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:35 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > This fix is merged and backported. Thanks!
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Randall
> > >
> > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi, Sophie:
> > >>
> > >> David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
> > >> executable from starting:
> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326. This was caused
> by a
> > >> recent fix of mine (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021
> )
> > >> and is a serious regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I
> > have
> > >> a one-line PR to fix the regression (
> > >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have verified it
> > >> corrects the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with your
> > >> approval, I can cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
> > >>
> > >> Best regards,
> > >>
> > >> Randall
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > sophie@confluent.io>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Ok, thanks for the update!
> > >>>
> > >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
> > >>> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a
> defect.
> > To
> > >>> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might
> need
> > >>> to use
> > >>> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on
> > other
> > >>> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
> > >>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
> > >>> > .
> > >>> >
> > >>> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
> > >>> >
> > >>> > Thank you very much.
> > >>> > Luke
> > >>> >
> > >>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>> >
> > >>> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> > >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I
> brought
> > >>> it to
> > >>> > > your attention.
> > >>> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we
> > don't
> > >>> > need
> > >>> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > Thanks.
> > >>> > > Luke
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >
> > >>> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke
> > >>> needs to
> > >>> > be
> > >>> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases
> > >>> where
> > >>> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> Ismael
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >>> sophie@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
> > >>> commit
> > >>> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But
> admittedly I
> > >>> don't
> > >>> > >> have
> > >>> > >> > much context on this particular issue
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
> > >>> including
> > >>> > >> it.
> > >>> > >> > However
> > >>> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't
> been
> > >>> > >> > cherrypicked by then
> > >>> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> > >>> wrote:
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
> > >>> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't
> > >>> insist on
> > >>> > >> > putting
> > >>> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> > >>> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the
> scala
> > >>> > 2.13.4
> > >>> > >> or
> > >>> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> > >>> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the
> > fix
> > >>> > into
> > >>> > >> 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > and 2.7.
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > Thank you.
> > >>> > >> > > Luke
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <
> > ismael@juma.me.uk>
> > >>> > >> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like
> an
> > >>> > >> > improvement
> > >>> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > Ismael
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <
> showuon@gmail.com
> > >
> > >>> > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> > >>> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked
> into
> > >>> 2.6
> > >>> > and
> > >>> > >> > 2.7
> > >>> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> > >>> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > >>> > >> > > > >.
> > >>> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of
> > >>> 2020, and
> > >>> > >> we
> > >>> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this
> PR
> > >>> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
> > >>> specifically,
> > >>> > >> it's
> > >>> > >> > > > here
> > >>> > >> > > > > <
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > .
> > >>> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on
> 2.8),
> > >>> but we
> > >>> > >> > didn't
> > >>> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible
> > >>> issues) not
> > >>> > >> to
> > >>> > >> > > adopt
> > >>> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into
> 2.6
> > >>> and
> > >>> > 2.7
> > >>> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > Thank you.
> > >>> > >> > > > > Luke
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >>> > >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their
> > way
> > >>> > over
> > >>> > >> to
> > >>> > >> > > the
> > >>> > >> > > > > 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an
> RC.
> > As
> > >>> > >> always,
> > >>> > >> > > > please
> > >>> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker
> bugs
> > >>> that
> > >>> > >> affect
> > >>> > >> > > 2.6
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >>> > >> > > > > > Sophie
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> > >>> > >> vvcephei@apache.org>
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > -John
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck
> wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> > >>> > >> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie
> > Blee-Goldman
> > >>> <
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a
> > >>> 2.6.2
> > >>> > >> > release.
> > >>> > >> > > > > This
> > >>> > >> > > > > > is
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > being
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka
> > Streams
> > >>> for
> > >>> > >> > Windows
> > >>> > >> > > > > > users.
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > > >
> > >>> > >> > > >
> > >>> > >> > >
> > >>> > >> >
> > >>> > >>
> > >>> > >
> > >>> >
> > >>>
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.
Thanks Randall. I think all three of those seem important and should be
merged back to the 2.6 branch.
On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 10:01 AM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Sophie.
>
> I have three new blockers related to a previous fix applied since 2.6.1
> that I'd like to merge to the 2.6 branch:
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12340 -- potential resource
> leak for Kafka*BackingStores used in Connect; PR is already approved and in
> trunk
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12339 -- may cause Connect
> worker to fail upon creation of internal topic (race condition); PR will
> likely be approved shortly
> * https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12343 -- Connect fails to
> read internal topics on AK 0.10.x; PR will likely be approved shortly
>
> Please let me know if it's okay to merge these to the 2.6 branch for
> inclusion in 2.6.2. Thanks!
>
> Randall
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:35 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This fix is merged and backported. Thanks!
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Randall
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi, Sophie:
> >>
> >> David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
> >> executable from starting:
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326. This was caused by a
> >> recent fix of mine (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021)
> >> and is a serious regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I
> have
> >> a one-line PR to fix the regression (
> >> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have verified it
> >> corrects the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with your
> >> approval, I can cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >>
> >> Randall
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> sophie@confluent.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ok, thanks for the update!
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
> >>> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect.
> To
> >>> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need
> >>> to use
> >>> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on
> other
> >>> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
> >>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
> >>> > .
> >>> >
> >>> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
> >>> >
> >>> > Thank you very much.
> >>> > Luke
> >>> >
> >>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> >>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought
> >>> it to
> >>> > > your attention.
> >>> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we
> don't
> >>> > need
> >>> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Thanks.
> >>> > > Luke
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke
> >>> needs to
> >>> > be
> >>> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases
> >>> where
> >>> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Ismael
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> >>> sophie@confluent.io>
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
> >>> commit
> >>> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I
> >>> don't
> >>> > >> have
> >>> > >> > much context on this particular issue
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
> >>> including
> >>> > >> it.
> >>> > >> > However
> >>> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
> >>> > >> > cherrypicked by then
> >>> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
> >>> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't
> >>> insist on
> >>> > >> > putting
> >>> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> >>> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala
> >>> > 2.13.4
> >>> > >> or
> >>> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> >>> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the
> fix
> >>> > into
> >>> > >> 2.6
> >>> > >> > > and 2.7.
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > What do you think?
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > Thank you.
> >>> > >> > > Luke
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <
> ismael@juma.me.uk>
> >>> > >> wrote:
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
> >>> > >> > improvement
> >>> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> >>> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > > > Ismael
> >>> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <showuon@gmail.com
> >
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> >>> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into
> >>> 2.6
> >>> > and
> >>> > >> > 2.7
> >>> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> >>> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> >>> > >> > > > >.
> >>> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of
> >>> 2020, and
> >>> > >> we
> >>> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> >>> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
> >>> specifically,
> >>> > >> it's
> >>> > >> > > > here
> >>> > >> > > > > <
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> >
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > .
> >>> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8),
> >>> but we
> >>> > >> > didn't
> >>> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible
> >>> issues) not
> >>> > >> to
> >>> > >> > > adopt
> >>> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6
> >>> and
> >>> > 2.7
> >>> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > Thank you.
> >>> > >> > > > > Luke
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> >>> > >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their
> way
> >>> > over
> >>> > >> to
> >>> > >> > > the
> >>> > >> > > > > 2.6
> >>> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC.
> As
> >>> > >> always,
> >>> > >> > > > please
> >>> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs
> >>> that
> >>> > >> affect
> >>> > >> > > 2.6
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >>> > >> > > > > > Sophie
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> >>> > >> vvcephei@apache.org>
> >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > -John
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
> >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> >>> > >> ismael@juma.me.uk
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> > > > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie
> Blee-Goldman
> >>> <
> >>> > >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a
> >>> 2.6.2
> >>> > >> > release.
> >>> > >> > > > > This
> >>> > >> > > > > > is
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > being
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka
> Streams
> >>> for
> >>> > >> > Windows
> >>> > >> > > > > > users.
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > > >
> >>> > >> > > > >
> >>> > >> > > >
> >>> > >> > >
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Sophie.
I have three new blockers related to a previous fix applied since 2.6.1
that I'd like to merge to the 2.6 branch:
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12340 -- potential resource
leak for Kafka*BackingStores used in Connect; PR is already approved and in
trunk
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12339 -- may cause Connect
worker to fail upon creation of internal topic (race condition); PR will
likely be approved shortly
* https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12343 -- Connect fails to
read internal topics on AK 0.10.x; PR will likely be approved shortly
Please let me know if it's okay to merge these to the 2.6 branch for
inclusion in 2.6.2. Thanks!
Randall
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 11:35 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This fix is merged and backported. Thanks!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Randall
>
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi, Sophie:
>>
>> David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
>> executable from starting:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326. This was caused by a
>> recent fix of mine (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021)
>> and is a serious regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I have
>> a one-line PR to fix the regression (
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have verified it
>> corrects the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with your
>> approval, I can cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Randall
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, thanks for the update!
>>>
>>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
>>> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect. To
>>> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need
>>> to use
>>> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on other
>>> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
>>> > .
>>> >
>>> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
>>> >
>>> > Thank you very much.
>>> > Luke
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
>>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought
>>> it to
>>> > > your attention.
>>> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't
>>> > need
>>> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
>>> > >
>>> > > Thanks.
>>> > > Luke
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke
>>> needs to
>>> > be
>>> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases
>>> where
>>> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Ismael
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>>> sophie@confluent.io>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
>>> commit
>>> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I
>>> don't
>>> > >> have
>>> > >> > much context on this particular issue
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
>>> including
>>> > >> it.
>>> > >> > However
>>> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
>>> > >> > cherrypicked by then
>>> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> >
>>> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
>>> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't
>>> insist on
>>> > >> > putting
>>> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
>>> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala
>>> > 2.13.4
>>> > >> or
>>> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
>>> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix
>>> > into
>>> > >> 2.6
>>> > >> > > and 2.7.
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > What do you think?
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > Thank you.
>>> > >> > > Luke
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
>>> > >> wrote:
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
>>> > >> > improvement
>>> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > Ismael
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
>>> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into
>>> 2.6
>>> > and
>>> > >> > 2.7
>>> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
>>> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
>>> > >> > > > >.
>>> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of
>>> 2020, and
>>> > >> we
>>> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
>>> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
>>> specifically,
>>> > >> it's
>>> > >> > > > here
>>> > >> > > > > <
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> >
>>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > .
>>> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8),
>>> but we
>>> > >> > didn't
>>> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible
>>> issues) not
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> > > adopt
>>> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6
>>> and
>>> > 2.7
>>> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > Thank you.
>>> > >> > > > > Luke
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>>> > >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
>>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way
>>> > over
>>> > >> to
>>> > >> > > the
>>> > >> > > > > 2.6
>>> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
>>> > >> always,
>>> > >> > > > please
>>> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs
>>> that
>>> > >> affect
>>> > >> > > 2.6
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>>> > >> > > > > > Sophie
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
>>> > >> vvcephei@apache.org>
>>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > -John
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
>>> > >> > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
>>> > >> > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
>>> > >> ismael@juma.me.uk
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
>>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
>>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman
>>> <
>>> > >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a
>>> 2.6.2
>>> > >> > release.
>>> > >> > > > > This
>>> > >> > > > > > is
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > being
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams
>>> for
>>> > >> > Windows
>>> > >> > > > > > users.
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
>>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > > >
>>> > >> > > > >
>>> > >> > > >
>>> > >> > >
>>> > >> >
>>> > >>
>>> > >
>>> >
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com>.
This fix is merged and backported. Thanks!
Best regards,
Randall
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 12:22 PM Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, Sophie:
>
> David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
> executable from starting:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326. This was caused by a
> recent fix of mine (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021)
> and is a serious regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I have
> a one-line PR to fix the regression (
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have verified it corrects
> the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with your approval, I can
> cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Randall
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
>> Ok, thanks for the update!
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
>> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect. To
>> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need to
>> use
>> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on other
>> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
>> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
>> > .
>> >
>> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
>> >
>> > Thank you very much.
>> > Luke
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
>> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought it
>> to
>> > > your attention.
>> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't
>> > need
>> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
>> > >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > > Luke
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs
>> to
>> > be
>> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases
>> where
>> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
>> > >>
>> > >> Ismael
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>> sophie@confluent.io>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
>> commit
>> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I
>> don't
>> > >> have
>> > >> > much context on this particular issue
>> > >> >
>> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
>> including
>> > >> it.
>> > >> > However
>> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
>> > >> > cherrypicked by then
>> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> >
>> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
>> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist
>> on
>> > >> > putting
>> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
>> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala
>> > 2.13.4
>> > >> or
>> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
>> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix
>> > into
>> > >> 2.6
>> > >> > > and 2.7.
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > What do you think?
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > Thank you.
>> > >> > > Luke
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
>> > >> wrote:
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
>> > >> > improvement
>> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > Ismael
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
>> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into
>> 2.6
>> > and
>> > >> > 2.7
>> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
>> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
>> > >> > > > >.
>> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020,
>> and
>> > >> we
>> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
>> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
>> specifically,
>> > >> it's
>> > >> > > > here
>> > >> > > > > <
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > .
>> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8),
>> but we
>> > >> > didn't
>> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues)
>> not
>> > >> to
>> > >> > > adopt
>> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6
>> and
>> > 2.7
>> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > Thank you.
>> > >> > > > > Luke
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>> > >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way
>> > over
>> > >> to
>> > >> > > the
>> > >> > > > > 2.6
>> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
>> > >> always,
>> > >> > > > please
>> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs
>> that
>> > >> affect
>> > >> > > 2.6
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > >> > > > > > Sophie
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
>> > >> vvcephei@apache.org>
>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > -John
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
>> > >> > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
>> > >> > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
>> > >> ismael@juma.me.uk
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>> > >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
>> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a
>> 2.6.2
>> > >> > release.
>> > >> > > > > This
>> > >> > > > > > is
>> > >> > > > > > > > > being
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams
>> for
>> > >> > Windows
>> > >> > > > > > users.
>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> >
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
>> > >> > > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > > >
>> > >> > > > > >
>> > >> > > > >
>> > >> > > >
>> > >> > >
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Randall Hauch <rh...@gmail.com>.
Hi, Sophie:
David J. has found a regression in MirrorMaker 2 that prevents the MM2
executable from starting: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12326.
This was caused by a recent fix of mine (
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-10021) and is a serious
regression limited to the MirrorMaker 2 executable. I have a one-line PR to
fix the regression (https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/10122) and have
verified it corrects the MM2 executable. Once the PR is approved and with
your approval, I can cherry-pick to the `2.6` branch.
Best regards,
Randall
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 12:43 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Ok, thanks for the update!
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael & Sophie,
> > Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect. To
> > work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need to
> use
> > the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on other
> > projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref:
> https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
> > .
> >
> > So, you can continue to cut the rc.
> >
> > Thank you very much.
> > Luke
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> > > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought it
> to
> > > your attention.
> > > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't
> > need
> > > to cherry-pick the fix.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > > Luke
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs
> to
> > be
> > >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases where
> > >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
> > >>
> > >> Ismael
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <sophie@confluent.io
> >
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the
> commit
> > >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I
> don't
> > >> have
> > >> > much context on this particular issue
> > >> >
> > >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against
> including
> > >> it.
> > >> > However
> > >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
> > >> > cherrypicked by then
> > >> > I won't block the release on it.
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Hi Ismael,
> > >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist
> on
> > >> > putting
> > >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> > >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala
> > 2.13.4
> > >> or
> > >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> > >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix
> > into
> > >> 2.6
> > >> > > and 2.7.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > What do you think?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thank you.
> > >> > > Luke
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
> > >> > improvement
> > >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > Ismael
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> > >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6
> > and
> > >> > 2.7
> > >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > >> > > > >.
> > >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020,
> and
> > >> we
> > >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> > >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more
> specifically,
> > >> it's
> > >> > > > here
> > >> > > > > <
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > .
> > >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but
> we
> > >> > didn't
> > >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues)
> not
> > >> to
> > >> > > adopt
> > >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and
> > 2.7
> > >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > Thank you.
> > >> > > > > Luke
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Hey all,
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way
> > over
> > >> to
> > >> > > the
> > >> > > > > 2.6
> > >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
> > >> always,
> > >> > > > please
> > >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that
> > >> affect
> > >> > > 2.6
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > Thanks!
> > >> > > > > > Sophie
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> > >> vvcephei@apache.org>
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > I'm +1
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > -John
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > Bill
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> > >> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >> > >
> > >> > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2
> > >> > release.
> > >> > > > > This
> > >> > > > > > is
> > >> > > > > > > > > being
> > >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> > >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams
> for
> > >> > Windows
> > >> > > > > > users.
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> > >> > > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > > >
> > >> > > > > >
> > >> > > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.
Ok, thanks for the update!
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 1:06 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ismael & Sophie,
> Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect. To
> work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need to use
> the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on other
> projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956
> .
>
> So, you can continue to cut the rc.
>
> Thank you very much.
> Luke
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought it to
> > your attention.
> > Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't
> need
> > to cherry-pick the fix.
> >
> > Thanks.
> > Luke
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs to
> be
> >> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases where
> >> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
> >>
> >> Ismael
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the commit
> >> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I don't
> >> have
> >> > much context on this particular issue
> >> >
> >> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against including
> >> it.
> >> > However
> >> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
> >> > cherrypicked by then
> >> > I won't block the release on it.
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi Ismael,
> >> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on
> >> > putting
> >> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> >> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala
> 2.13.4
> >> or
> >> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> >> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix
> into
> >> 2.6
> >> > > and 2.7.
> >> > >
> >> > > What do you think?
> >> > >
> >> > > Thank you.
> >> > > Luke
> >> > >
> >> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> >> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
> >> > improvement
> >> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Ismael
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> >> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6
> and
> >> > 2.7
> >> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> >> > > > >.
> >> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and
> >> we
> >> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> >> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically,
> >> it's
> >> > > > here
> >> > > > > <
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > .
> >> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we
> >> > didn't
> >> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not
> >> to
> >> > > adopt
> >> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and
> 2.7
> >> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Thank you.
> >> > > > > Luke
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> >> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hey all,
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way
> over
> >> to
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > 2.6
> >> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
> >> always,
> >> > > > please
> >> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that
> >> affect
> >> > > 2.6
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > Thanks!
> >> > > > > > Sophie
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> >> vvcephei@apache.org>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > I'm +1
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > -John
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > Bill
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> >> ismael@juma.me.uk
> >> > >
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> >> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> >> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2
> >> > release.
> >> > > > > This
> >> > > > > > is
> >> > > > > > > > > being
> >> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> >> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for
> >> > Windows
> >> > > > > > users.
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> >> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> >> > > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > > >
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ismael & Sophie,
Sorry, after some investigation, I think this might not be a defect. To
work with the project with a specific scala version, user might need to use
the same version as the project used. This issue also happened on other
projects using scala, ex: Spark. ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/61677956.
So, you can continue to cut the rc.
Thank you very much.
Luke
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:19 AM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought it to
> your attention.
> Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't need
> to cherry-pick the fix.
>
> Thanks.
> Luke
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs to be
>> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases where
>> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
>>
>> Ismael
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the commit
>> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I don't
>> have
>> > much context on this particular issue
>> >
>> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against including
>> it.
>> > However
>> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
>> > cherrypicked by then
>> > I won't block the release on it.
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi Ismael,
>> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on
>> > putting
>> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
>> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala 2.13.4
>> or
>> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
>> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix into
>> 2.6
>> > > and 2.7.
>> > >
>> > > What do you think?
>> > >
>> > > Thank you.
>> > > Luke
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
>> > improvement
>> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
>> > > >
>> > > > Ismael
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi Sophie,
>> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and
>> > 2.7
>> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
>> > > > >.
>> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and
>> we
>> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
>> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically,
>> it's
>> > > > here
>> > > > > <
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > .
>> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we
>> > didn't
>> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not
>> to
>> > > adopt
>> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
>> > > > > branches. What do you think?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > Thank you.
>> > > > > Luke
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>> > > sophie@confluent.io>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > >
>> > > > > > Hey all,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over
>> to
>> > > the
>> > > > > 2.6
>> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
>> always,
>> > > > please
>> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that
>> affect
>> > > 2.6
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Thanks!
>> > > > > > Sophie
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
>> vvcephei@apache.org>
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > I'm +1
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > -John
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
>> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Bill
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
>> ismael@juma.me.uk
>> > >
>> > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Ismael
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
>> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
>> > > > > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2
>> > release.
>> > > > > This
>> > > > > > is
>> > > > > > > > > being
>> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
>> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for
>> > Windows
>> > > > > > users.
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
>> > > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>.
I just saw the defect KAFKA-12312
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>, so I brought it to
your attention.
Do you think it's not a compatibility issue? If not, I think we don't need
to cherry-pick the fix.
Thanks.
Luke
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 11:16 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs to be
> clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases where
> someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
>
> Ismael
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the commit
> > message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I don't
> have
> > much context on this particular issue
> >
> > If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against including
> it.
> > However
> > I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
> > cherrypicked by then
> > I won't block the release on it.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Ismael,
> > > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on
> > putting
> > > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> > > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala 2.13.4
> or
> > > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> > > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix into
> 2.6
> > > and 2.7.
> > >
> > > What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Luke
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
> > improvement
> > > > versus a critical bug fix.
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Sophie,
> > > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and
> > 2.7
> > > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > > > >.
> > > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> > > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> > > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically,
> it's
> > > > here
> > > > > <
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > > > > >
> > > > > .
> > > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we
> > didn't
> > > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to
> > > adopt
> > > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > > > >
> > > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> > > > > branches. What do you think?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > Luke
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hey all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over
> to
> > > the
> > > > > 2.6
> > > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As
> always,
> > > > please
> > > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that
> affect
> > > 2.6
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <
> vvcephei@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'm +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -John
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <
> ismael@juma.me.uk
> > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2
> > release.
> > > > > This
> > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for
> > Windows
> > > > > > users.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
It's a perf improvement, there was no regression. I think Luke needs to be
clearer how this impacts users. Luke, are you referring to cases where
someone runs the broker in an embedded scenario (eg tests)?
Ismael
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021, 6:50 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the commit
> message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I don't have
> much context on this particular issue
>
> If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against including it.
> However
> I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
> cherrypicked by then
> I won't block the release on it.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Ismael,
> > Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on
> putting
> > it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> > In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala 2.13.4 or
> > later to use Kafka 2.6.
> > So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix into 2.6
> > and 2.7.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Luke
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> >
> > > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an
> improvement
> > > versus a critical bug fix.
> > >
> > > Ismael
> > >
> > > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Sophie,
> > > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and
> 2.7
> > > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > > >.
> > > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> > > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> > > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's
> > > here
> > > > <
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > > > >
> > > > .
> > > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we
> didn't
> > > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to
> > adopt
> > > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> > > > branches. What do you think?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > Luke
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hey all,
> > > > >
> > > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to
> > the
> > > > 2.6
> > > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always,
> > > please
> > > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect
> > 2.6
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > Sophie
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -John
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Bill
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <ismael@juma.me.uk
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2
> release.
> > > > This
> > > > > is
> > > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for
> Windows
> > > > > users.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.
What do you think Ismael? I agreed initially because I saw the commit
message says it fixes a performance regression. But admittedly I don't have
much context on this particular issue
If it's low risk then I don't have a strong argument against including it.
However
I aim to cut the rc tomorrow or Thursday, and if it hasn't been
cherrypicked by then
I won't block the release on it.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:53 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ismael,
> Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on putting
> it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
> In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala 2.13.4 or
> later to use Kafka 2.6.
> So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix into 2.6
> and 2.7.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thank you.
> Luke
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an improvement
> > versus a critical bug fix.
> >
> > Ismael
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Sophie,
> > > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and 2.7
> > > branches: KAFKA-12312 <
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> > >.
> > > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> > > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> > > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's
> > here
> > > <
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > > >
> > > .
> > > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we didn't
> > > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to
> adopt
> > > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> > >
> > > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> > > branches. What do you think?
> > >
> > > Thank you.
> > > Luke
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> sophie@confluent.io>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hey all,
> > > >
> > > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to
> the
> > > 2.6
> > > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always,
> > please
> > > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect
> 2.6
> > > >
> > > > Thanks!
> > > > Sophie
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm +1
> > > > >
> > > > > -John
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bill
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release.
> > > This
> > > > is
> > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows
> > > > users.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ismael,
Yes, I agree it's like an improvement, not a bug. I don't insist on putting
it into 2.6, just want to bring it to your attention.
In my opinion, this issue will block users who adopt the scala 2.13.4 or
later to use Kafka 2.6.
So if we still have time, we can consider to cherry-pick the fix into 2.6
and 2.7.
What do you think?
Thank you.
Luke
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 3:24 AM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an improvement
> versus a critical bug fix.
>
> Ismael
>
> On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sophie,
> > I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and 2.7
> > branches: KAFKA-12312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312
> >.
> > Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> > upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> > <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's
> here
> > <
> >
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> > >
> > .
> > We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we didn't
> > tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to adopt
> > the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
> >
> > Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> > branches. What do you think?
> >
> > Thank you.
> > Luke
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to the
> > 2.6
> > > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always,
> please
> > > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect 2.6
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > > Sophie
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > > >
> > > > I'm +1
> > > >
> > > > -John
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Bill
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Ismael
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release.
> > This
> > > is
> > > > > > being
> > > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows
> > > users.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > > >
> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>.
Can you elaborate why this needs to be in 2.6? Seems like an improvement
versus a critical bug fix.
Ismael
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
> I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and 2.7
> branches: KAFKA-12312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>.
> Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's here
> <
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> >
> .
> We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we didn't
> tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to adopt
> the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
>
> Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> branches. What do you think?
>
> Thank you.
> Luke
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to the
> 2.6
> > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always, please
> > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect 2.6
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sophie
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > >
> > > I'm +1
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release.
> This
> > is
> > > > > being
> > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows
> > users.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>.
Sure, you can go ahead and merge that back to the 2.6 branch. I'll hold off
on cutting the RC until then
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Sophie,
> I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and 2.7
> branches: KAFKA-12312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>.
> Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
> upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
> <https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's here
> <
> https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292
> >
> .
> We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we didn't
> tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to adopt
> the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
>
> Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
> branches. What do you think?
>
> Thank you.
> Luke
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
> wrote:
>
> > Hey all,
> >
> > Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to the
> 2.6
> > branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always, please
> > let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect 2.6
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Sophie
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> > >
> > > I'm +1
> > >
> > > -John
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > > >
> > > > Bill
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Ismael
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release.
> This
> > is
> > > > > being
> > > > > > accelerated
> > > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows
> > users.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > > >
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sophie
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Kafka 2.6.2 release
Posted by Luke Chen <sh...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sophie,
I found there is 1 issue that should be cherry-picked into 2.6 and 2.7
branches: KAFKA-12312 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-12312>.
Simply put, *Scala* *2.13.4* is released at the end of 2020, and we
upgraded to it and fixed some compatible issues on this PR
<https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643>, more specifically, it's here
<https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9643/files#diff-fda3fb44e69a19600913bd951431fb0035996c76325b1c1d84d6f34bec281205R292>
.
We only merged this fix on *trunk*(which will be on 2.8), but we didn't
tell users (or we didn't know there'll be compatible issues) not to adopt
the latest *Scala* *2.13.4*.
Therefore, I think we should cherry-pick this fix into 2.6 and 2.7
branches. What do you think?
Thank you.
Luke
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:10 AM Sophie Blee-Goldman <so...@confluent.io>
wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> Since all outstanding bugfixes seem to have made their way over to the 2.6
> branch by now, I plan to move ahead with cutting an RC. As always, please
> let me know if you uncover and critical or blocker bugs that affect 2.6
>
> Thanks!
> Sophie
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 9:25 AM John Roesler <vv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks so much for stepping up, Sophie!
> >
> > I'm +1
> >
> > -John
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 17:59 -0500, Bill Bejeck wrote:
> > > Thanks for taking this on Sophie. +1
> > >
> > > Bill
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 5:59 PM Ismael Juma <is...@juma.me.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks Sophie! +1
> > > >
> > > > Ismael
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 2:45 PM Sophie Blee-Goldman <
> > sophie@confluent.io>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi all,
> > > > >
> > > > > I'd like to volunteer as release manager for a 2.6.2 release. This
> is
> > > > being
> > > > > accelerated
> > > > > to address a critical regression in Kafka Streams for Windows
> users.
> > > > >
> > > > > You can find the release plan on the wiki:
> > > > >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Release+Plan+2.6.2
> > > > >
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > Sophie
> > > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>