Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

[Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>]

It looks like all our builds are reliant upon activemq-protobuf version
1.0-Snapshot.  Activemq released version 1.0 of activemq-protobuf last
week.  Should we be upgrading?  That should fix the build failures we've
been having.

~Jason Warner

Re: Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

[Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>]

Ah, ok.  Thanks for catching that.  That'll teach me to look at things on a
wednesday morning.

~Jason Warner


On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ivan <xh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> From the stack, it seems that activemq-core 5.3-snapshot depends on
> activemq-protobuf 1.0-snapshot, not Geronimo depends on it directly.
> One way is to wait the activemq 5.3, or use the exclude in our pom file to
> use 1.0 temporarily ?
>
> 2009/9/30 Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>
>
>> It looks like all our builds are reliant upon activemq-protobuf version
>> 1.0-Snapshot.  Activemq released version 1.0 of activemq-protobuf last
>> week.  Should we be upgrading?  That should fix the build failures we've
>> been having.
>>
>> ~Jason Warner
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
>

Re: Upgrade to activemq-protobuf version 1.0?

[Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>]

>From the stack, it seems that activemq-core 5.3-snapshot depends on
activemq-protobuf 1.0-snapshot, not Geronimo depends on it directly.
One way is to wait the activemq 5.3, or use the exclude in our pom file to
use 1.0 temporarily ?

2009/9/30 Jason Warner <ja...@gmail.com>

> It looks like all our builds are reliant upon activemq-protobuf version
> 1.0-Snapshot.  Activemq released version 1.0 of activemq-protobuf last
> week.  Should we be upgrading?  That should fix the build failures we've
> been having.
>
> ~Jason Warner
>



-- 
Ivan