You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by "KIND,LANCE (HP-FtCollins,ex1)" <la...@hp.com> on 2001/08/03 01:45:23 UTC

Look like a good Array proxy?

I am having trouble getting this client Proxy too work.  Perhaps there is
something I don't understand about the client libraries.  Could some one
take a quick look at the attached ArrayProxy.java?  It is supposed to be the
proxy for the attached PrimitiveArrayOperations.java.  I have also attached
the deployment file (pertinent for the method namespace).
 
The services that don't have arrays in the signature operate - ping() for
example.  But ones with arrays in the signature get refused like the method
doesn't exist.  (Sorry, I don't have the SOAP:Fault message in front of me.)
 
I plan on beating on this later, but I thought I would send this out in case
someone sees something obvious.  
 
Cheers,
 
==>Lancer--- 
 

Re: Look like a good Array proxy?

Posted by Rob Jellinghaus <ro...@unrealities.com>.
At 04:45 PM 8/2/2001 -0700, KIND,LANCE (HP-FtCollins,ex1) wrote:
>I am having trouble getting this client Proxy too work.  Perhaps there is
something I don't understand about the client libraries.  Could some one
take a quick look at the attached ArrayProxy.java?  It is supposed to be
the proxy for the attached PrimitiveArrayOperations.java.  I have also
attached the deployment file (pertinent for the method namespace).
>  
>The services that don't have arrays in the signature operate - ping() for
example.  But ones with arrays in the signature get refused like the method
doesn't exist.  (Sorry, I don't have the SOAP:Fault message in front of me.)
>  
>I plan on beating on this later, but I thought I would send this out in
case someone sees something obvious.  

Um, as I received it, here is PrimitiveArrayOperations.java:

package samples.primitivetypes;

/**
 * Class using for testing the invocation of methods from
 * a VisualStudio.NET client.  Reason for new class instead of just using
RPCMethods:
 * wanted to return value in each method rather than set a static value.
 * @author Lance Kind lance_kind@hp.com
 */
public class PrimitiveArrayOperations
{
/**
 * VisualStudioDotNetTarget constructor comment.
 */
public PrimitiveArrayOperations() {
	super();
}


That's it.  That's the whole thing.  There really *aren't* any AddBytes,
AddDoubles, etc. operations defined on it!

?????

Cheers,
Rob