RDF Patch via HTTP PATCH verb?

[Alan Snyder <al...@gmail.com>]

Over on the users list I described an issue with RDF patch on an LDP
Container I'm testing - I am getting a HTTP 401 issue on the client side,
but also noticed on the server side I was seeing..

19:20:13.336 WARN  - request did not contain a supported HTTP method


...repeated several times in the logs. I dug in and found the HTTPMethods
class doesn't enumerate PATCH as a supported type. After adding it, the
server message goes away but I still get the security 401 response.


Before I go down an unfruitful path, does anyone know if RDF Patch is
supported as an HTTP PATCH request, or is just through java api's? This
would be one area I'd be interested in fleshing out and finishing if not.
We may also be interested in implementing some of, if not all of, the
LDPatch spec too.



Thanks

Re: RDF Patch via HTTP PATCH verb?

[Alan Snyder <al...@gmail.com>]

Any insights here...? This would be extremely helpful for our use case!

On Sun, Mar 3, 2019 at 7:56 PM Alan Snyder <al...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Over on the users list I described an issue with RDF patch on an LDP
> Container I'm testing - I am getting a HTTP 401 issue on the client side,
> but also noticed on the server side I was seeing..
>
> 19:20:13.336 WARN  - request did not contain a supported HTTP method
>
>
> ...repeated several times in the logs. I dug in and found the HTTPMethods
> class doesn't enumerate PATCH as a supported type. After adding it, the
> server message goes away but I still get the security 401 response.
>
>
> Before I go down an unfruitful path, does anyone know if RDF Patch is
> supported as an HTTP PATCH request, or is just through java api's? This
> would be one area I'd be interested in fleshing out and finishing if not.
> We may also be interested in implementing some of, if not all of, the
> LDPatch spec too.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>