You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Jing Zhao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/12/02 21:04:36 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HDFS-5590) Sequential block ID may cause data
loss when persistBlocks is set to false
Jing Zhao created HDFS-5590:
-------------------------------
Summary: Sequential block ID may cause data loss when persistBlocks is set to false
Key: HDFS-5590
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-5590
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2.0
Reporter: Jing Zhao
Assignee: Jing Zhao
In a cluster with non-HA setup and dfs.persist.blocks set to false, the current sequential block ID may cause data loss in the following case:
# client creates file1 and requests a block from NN and get blk_id1_gs1
# client writes blk_id1_gs1 to DN
# NN is restarted and because persistBlocks is false, blk_id1_gs1 is not persisted in editlog
# another client creates file2 and NN will allocate a new block using the same block id blk_id1_gs1 since block ID and generation stamp are both increased sequentially.
Now we may have two versions (file1 and file2) of the blk_id1_gs1 (same id, same gs) in the system. It will case data loss.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)