You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> on 2007/05/10 16:04:40 UTC
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
On 5/10/07, Manu T George (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
>
> Manu T George deleted OPENEJB-512:
> ----------------------------------
Why have these ones been deleted? No issues should ever be deleted.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 will do that :).
On 5/11/07, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I wouldn't readd and close all the jiras all over again -- I
> > think your time is more valuable than that and it's really not a big
> > deal. If you really want to sink a half an hour into something to
> > make yourself feel better, find something to document :)
>
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 5/10/07, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:
> Anyway, I wouldn't readd and close all the jiras all over again -- I
> think your time is more valuable than that and it's really not a big
> deal. If you really want to sink a half an hour into something to
> make yourself feel better, find something to document :)
+1
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On May 10, 2007, at 10:44 AM, Manu George wrote:
> I get your point that its inappropriate to delete JIRA's. Well if
> there is no other way to do it
> I will create them and mark them as invalid. I have to face up to the
> consequences of my actions even if its 1/2 hr of drudgery :) .
>
> The JIRA site shows an interesting point that it is Web service
> enabled for programmatic control (supports SOAP, XML-RPC and REST
> interfaces). Probably we can exploit this to hav a local client that
> does batch updates :)
I've deleted a jira issue from time to time, but usually only when
adding jiras. Sometimes I get a couple in and then think, "Hmm, I
want to do this all differently" -- typically when I want to make
them subtasks of another issue which seems to be the one thing you
can't do via the "Edit" feature.
It's a judgement call. There can be merit in a closed jira saying
"it turns out we don't need to test this" whereas I think there's
little value in something like "whoops, I messed up, pretend this
issue doesn't exist, the real issue is FOO-123"
Anyway, I wouldn't readd and close all the jiras all over again -- I
think your time is more valuable than that and it's really not a big
deal. If you really want to sink a half an hour into something to
make yourself feel better, find something to document :)
-David
> Regards
> Manu
>
> On 5/10/07, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
>> On 5/10/07, Manu George <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Jacek,
>> > I had created these test cases but found out that
>> they
>> > were no longer relevant and most were redundant as they were
>> addressed
>> > in different places. They were open and there were no updates.
>> There
>> > were some 35 JIRA's that were open but they were all for testing
>> > annotations. So I thought I would create a single JIRA just for
>> > tracking the annotation tests. I am sorry if the deletion is a
>> > problem, I can recreate them again if required.
>>
>> They should've been marked as invalid at the very least. I don't want
>> you to be doing the task just because I thought it's inappropriate to
>> delete them. Perhaps others will chime in and propose less cumbersome
>> one.
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>> --
>> Jacek Laskowski
>> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>>
>
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
I get your point that its inappropriate to delete JIRA's. Well if
there is no other way to do it
I will create them and mark them as invalid. I have to face up to the
consequences of my actions even if its 1/2 hr of drudgery :) .
The JIRA site shows an interesting point that it is Web service
enabled for programmatic control (supports SOAP, XML-RPC and REST
interfaces). Probably we can exploit this to hav a local client that
does batch updates :)
Regards
Manu
On 5/10/07, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Manu George <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Jacek,
> > I had created these test cases but found out that they
> > were no longer relevant and most were redundant as they were addressed
> > in different places. They were open and there were no updates. There
> > were some 35 JIRA's that were open but they were all for testing
> > annotations. So I thought I would create a single JIRA just for
> > tracking the annotation tests. I am sorry if the deletion is a
> > problem, I can recreate them again if required.
>
> They should've been marked as invalid at the very least. I don't want
> you to be doing the task just because I thought it's inappropriate to
> delete them. Perhaps others will chime in and propose less cumbersome
> one.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On 5/10/07, Manu George <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Jacek,
> I had created these test cases but found out that they
> were no longer relevant and most were redundant as they were addressed
> in different places. They were open and there were no updates. There
> were some 35 JIRA's that were open but they were all for testing
> annotations. So I thought I would create a single JIRA just for
> tracking the annotation tests. I am sorry if the deletion is a
> problem, I can recreate them again if required.
They should've been marked as invalid at the very least. I don't want
you to be doing the task just because I thought it's inappropriate to
delete them. Perhaps others will chime in and propose less cumbersome
one.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [jira] Deleted: (OPENEJB-512) iTest for Testing the javax.persistence.PersistenceProperty Annotation
Posted by Manu George <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hi Jacek,
I had created these test cases but found out that they
were no longer relevant and most were redundant as they were addressed
in different places. They were open and there were no updates. There
were some 35 JIRA's that were open but they were all for testing
annotations. So I thought I would create a single JIRA just for
tracking the annotation tests. I am sorry if the deletion is a
problem, I can recreate them again if required.
Regards
Manu
On 5/10/07, Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl> wrote:
> On 5/10/07, Manu T George (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
> >
> > Manu T George deleted OPENEJB-512:
> > ----------------------------------
>
> Why have these ones been deleted? No issues should ever be deleted.
>
> Jacek
>
> --
> Jacek Laskowski
> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
>