You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de> on 2015/12/27 21:15:28 UTC
bigtop/puppet images
Hi,
I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
opensuse-12.3
ubuntu-10.04
ubuntu-12.04
centos-6.4
Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
Olaf
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>.
Ok, I will drop it!
Olaf
> Am 29.12.2015 um 20:15 schrieb Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>:
>
> As somebody who introduced them in the first place -- I say: drop it!
> Drop it now! ;-)
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org>.
As somebody who introduced them in the first place -- I say: drop it!
Drop it now! ;-)
Thanks,
Roman.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 10:54 AM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 05:08PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Since they are not maintained any more I vote for removing. I doubt that
>> there is any usecase for keeping them. Build Processes and Images are broken
>> now, since many URL have been invalidated since this release.
>>
>> I propose to have a vote to remove any docker images and jenkins job related
>> to pre-1.0 bigtop.
>
> Seems like we are coming to the consensus anyway, why even bother with the vote?
>
> Cos
>
>> > Am 28.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>:
>> >
>> > I'm not quite sure whether Bigtop 0.8 users need them or not.
>> > They're not for regression. And there's no cost for keeping these images.
>> > I guess it's better to remove them for a cleaner view?
>> > Any reason to remove?
>> >
>> > 2015-12-28 10:23 GMT+08:00 MrAsanjar . <af...@gmail.com>:
>> >
>> >> I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
>> >>>> Hi,
>> >>>>
>> >>>> I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
>> >>>>
>> >>>> opensuse-12.3
>> >>>> ubuntu-10.04
>> >>>> ubuntu-12.04
>> >>>> centos-6.4
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
>> >>>>
>> >>>> The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Olaf
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>
>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 05:08PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Since they are not maintained any more I vote for removing. I doubt that
> there is any usecase for keeping them. Build Processes and Images are broken
> now, since many URL have been invalidated since this release.
>
> I propose to have a vote to remove any docker images and jenkins job related
> to pre-1.0 bigtop.
Seems like we are coming to the consensus anyway, why even bother with the vote?
Cos
> > Am 28.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>:
> >
> > I'm not quite sure whether Bigtop 0.8 users need them or not.
> > They're not for regression. And there's no cost for keeping these images.
> > I guess it's better to remove them for a cleaner view?
> > Any reason to remove?
> >
> > 2015-12-28 10:23 GMT+08:00 MrAsanjar . <af...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
> >>>>
> >>>> opensuse-12.3
> >>>> ubuntu-10.04
> >>>> ubuntu-12.04
> >>>> centos-6.4
> >>>>
> >>>> Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
> >>>>
> >>>> The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Olaf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>.
If those things are broken, then I'm also +1 for removing them.
2015-12-30 0:08 GMT+08:00 Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>:
> Hi,
>
> Since they are not maintained any more I vote for removing. I doubt that
> there is any usecase for keeping them. Build Processes and Images are
> broken now, since many URL have been invalidated since this release.
>
> I propose to have a vote to remove any docker images and jenkins job
> related to pre-1.0 bigtop.
>
> Olaf
>
>
> > Am 28.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>:
> >
> > I'm not quite sure whether Bigtop 0.8 users need them or not.
> > They're not for regression. And there's no cost for keeping these images.
> > I guess it's better to remove them for a cleaner view?
> > Any reason to remove?
> >
> > 2015-12-28 10:23 GMT+08:00 MrAsanjar . <af...@gmail.com>:
> >
> >> I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
> >>>>
> >>>> opensuse-12.3
> >>>> ubuntu-10.04
> >>>> ubuntu-12.04
> >>>> centos-6.4
> >>>>
> >>>> Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
> >>>>
> >>>> The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
> >>>>
> >>>> Olaf
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Olaf Flebbe <of...@oflebbe.de>.
Hi,
Since they are not maintained any more I vote for removing. I doubt that there is any usecase for keeping them. Build Processes and Images are broken now, since many URL have been invalidated since this release.
I propose to have a vote to remove any docker images and jenkins job related to pre-1.0 bigtop.
Olaf
> Am 28.12.2015 um 16:18 schrieb Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>:
>
> I'm not quite sure whether Bigtop 0.8 users need them or not.
> They're not for regression. And there's no cost for keeping these images.
> I guess it's better to remove them for a cleaner view?
> Any reason to remove?
>
> 2015-12-28 10:23 GMT+08:00 MrAsanjar . <af...@gmail.com>:
>
>> I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
>>>>
>>>> opensuse-12.3
>>>> ubuntu-10.04
>>>> ubuntu-12.04
>>>> centos-6.4
>>>>
>>>> Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
>>>>
>>>> The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
>>>>
>>>> Olaf
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Evans Ye <ev...@apache.org>.
I'm not quite sure whether Bigtop 0.8 users need them or not.
They're not for regression. And there's no cost for keeping these images.
I guess it's better to remove them for a cleaner view?
Any reason to remove?
2015-12-28 10:23 GMT+08:00 MrAsanjar . <af...@gmail.com>:
> I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
> > >
> > > opensuse-12.3
> > > ubuntu-10.04
> > > ubuntu-12.04
> > > centos-6.4
> > >
> > > Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
> > >
> > > The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
> > >
> > > Olaf
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by "MrAsanjar ." <af...@gmail.com>.
I would definitely reduce number of regression testing.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 2:19 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
> >
> > opensuse-12.3
> > ubuntu-10.04
> > ubuntu-12.04
> > centos-6.4
> >
> > Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
> >
> > The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
> >
> > Olaf
>
>
>
Re: bigtop/puppet images
Posted by Konstantin Boudnik <co...@apache.org>.
+1
On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 09:15PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I see obsolete tags in bigtop/puppet
>
> opensuse-12.3
> ubuntu-10.04
> ubuntu-12.04
> centos-6.4
>
> Any contraindications to remove these unmaintained images?
>
> The rest seems to be build by out CI process.
>
> Olaf