You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> on 2005/10/20 07:04:51 UTC
Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/.... rather
than geronimo/jars/...
I think we should make this change before 1.0 goes out.
In a related issue, the packaging plugin stores the built
configurations in the maven repo, and as a consequence the configID
uris are of the form
geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car
just like a dependency uri. Getting these fixed to
org.apache.geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car before they are
widely used would be a good think IMO.
Comments?
thanks
david jencks
Re: Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
+1
Regards,
Alan
On 10/20/2005 7:23 AM, Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> +1 I think any work we can get out of the way incrementally towards M2
> is good.
>
> Matt
>
> Jacek Laskowski wrote:
>
>> David Jencks wrote:
>>
>>> IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
>>> artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/....
>>> rather than geronimo/jars/...
>>
>>
>>
>> If Maven2 recommends this approach I'm fine with it. That's a very
>> small change noone would likely even notice. I'd call it a low-level
>> detail.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>> david jencks
>>
>>
>>
>> Jacek
>>
>>
>>
Re: Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
Posted by Matt Hogstrom <ma...@hogstrom.org>.
+1 I think any work we can get out of the way incrementally towards M2 is good.
Matt
Jacek Laskowski wrote:
> David Jencks wrote:
>
>> IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
>> artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/....
>> rather than geronimo/jars/...
>
>
> If Maven2 recommends this approach I'm fine with it. That's a very small
> change noone would likely even notice. I'd call it a low-level detail.
>
> +1
>
>> david jencks
>
>
> Jacek
>
>
>
Re: Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <jl...@apache.org>.
David Jencks wrote:
> IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
> artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/.... rather
> than geronimo/jars/...
If Maven2 recommends this approach I'm fine with it. That's a very small
change noone would likely even notice. I'd call it a low-level detail.
+1
> david jencks
Jacek
Re: Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
Posted by "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@apache.org>.
+1
On Oct 20, 2005, at 1:04 AM, David Jencks wrote:
> IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
> artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/....
> rather than geronimo/jars/...
>
> I think we should make this change before 1.0 goes out.
>
> In a related issue, the packaging plugin stores the built
> configurations in the maven repo, and as a consequence the configID
> uris are of the form
>
> geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car
>
> just like a dependency uri. Getting these fixed to
>
> org.apache.geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car before they
> are widely used would be a good think IMO.
>
> Comments?
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
>
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
geirm@apache.org
Re: Lets change maven repo location from geronimo to org.apache.geronimo
Posted by Bruce Snyder <br...@gmail.com>.
On 10/19/05, David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> IIUC the currently recommended-by-maven location for the geronimo
> artifacts in a maven repo would be org.apache.geronimo/jars/.... rather
> than geronimo/jars/...
>
> I think we should make this change before 1.0 goes out.
>
> In a related issue, the packaging plugin stores the built
> configurations in the maven repo, and as a consequence the configID
> uris are of the form
>
> geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car
>
> just like a dependency uri. Getting these fixed to
>
> org.apache.geronimo/cars/j2ee-server-1.0-SNAPSHOT.car before they are
> widely used would be a good think IMO.
I don't have a problem with the change, but I'm curious to know the
reason behind the recommendation. Can you explain the rationale for
this change?
Bruce
--
perl -e 'print unpack("u30","D0G)U8V4\@4VYY9&5R\"F)R=6-E+G-N>61E<D\!G;6%I;\"YC;VT*"
);'
The Castor Project
http://www.castor.org/
Apache Geronimo
http://geronimo.apache.org/