You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commons-dev@ws.apache.org by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/12 19:31:53 UTC
XmlSchema activities
Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
that activity?
2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
Hi Benson,
What's the plan for 2.0? What will be new / better / faster / cheaper etc.? :)
Sanjiva.
Benson Margulies wrote:
> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>
> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>
> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
> that activity?
>
> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>
> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>
> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
--
Sanjiva Weerawarana, Ph.D.
Founder & Director; Lanka Software Foundation; http://www.opensource.lk/
Founder, Chairman & CEO; WSO2, Inc.; http://www.wso2.com/
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
Visiting Lecturer; University of Moratuwa; http://www.cse.mrt.ac.lk/
Blog: http://sanjiva.weerawarana.org/
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Please apply patches to both the branch and the trunk :)
-- dims
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So, I'm going to start doing exciting things to the trunk after I
> apply some patches to this branch.
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> created a branch:
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/branches/modules/XmlSchema/1_4_X_BRANCH/
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hearing no further remarks, I guess we go with this? Davanum or Dan,
>>> would one of you like to do the basic branching honors? Or, if not,
>>> give me some coaching on mechanics?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1, to be formal about it.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
>>>>> whatever the version that may turn out to be.
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> -- dims
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>>>> Benson,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>>>>>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
>>>>>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> dims
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Some of these are:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>>>>>>> > 2) Improve performance.
>>>>>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>>>>>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>>>>>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>>>>>>> > clumsy code.
>>>>>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>>>>>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>>>>>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>>>>>>> > schemata from the API.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >> Benson,
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>>>>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>>>>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>>>>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>>>>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> thanks,
>>>>>>> >> dims
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>>>>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>>>>>> >>> that activity?
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>>>>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>>>>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>>>>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>>>>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>>>>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
So, I'm going to start doing exciting things to the trunk after I
apply some patches to this branch.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:54 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> created a branch:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/branches/modules/XmlSchema/1_4_X_BRANCH/
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hearing no further remarks, I guess we go with this? Davanum or Dan,
>> would one of you like to do the basic branching honors? Or, if not,
>> give me some coaching on mechanics?
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1, to be formal about it.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
>>>> whatever the version that may turn out to be.
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> -- dims
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>>> Benson,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>>>>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
>>>>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Dan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>> dims
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Some of these are:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>>>>>> > 2) Improve performance.
>>>>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>>>>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>>>>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>>>>>> > clumsy code.
>>>>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>>>>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>>>>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>>>>>> > schemata from the API.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >> Benson,
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>>>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>>>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>>>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>>>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> thanks,
>>>>>> >> dims
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>>>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>>>>> >>> that activity?
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>>>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>>>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>>>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>>>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>>>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> --
>>>>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
created a branch:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/branches/modules/XmlSchema/1_4_X_BRANCH/
thanks,
dims
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hearing no further remarks, I guess we go with this? Davanum or Dan,
> would one of you like to do the basic branching honors? Or, if not,
> give me some coaching on mechanics?
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1, to be formal about it.
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
>>> whatever the version that may turn out to be.
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -- dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>>> Benson,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>>>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>>>>
>>>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
>>>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>>>>
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> dims
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Some of these are:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>>>>> > 2) Improve performance.
>>>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>>>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>>>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>>>>> > clumsy code.
>>>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>>>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>>>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>>>>> > schemata from the API.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >> Benson,
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> thanks,
>>>>> >> dims
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>>>> >>> that activity?
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>>> >>>
>>>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Daniel Kulp
>>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
Hearing no further remarks, I guess we go with this? Davanum or Dan,
would one of you like to do the basic branching honors? Or, if not,
give me some coaching on mechanics?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 6:25 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1, to be formal about it.
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
>> whatever the version that may turn out to be.
>>
>> thanks,
>> -- dims
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>>> Benson,
>>>>
>>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>>>
>>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
>>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> dims
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>>> >
>>>> > Some of these are:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>>>> > 2) Improve performance.
>>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>>>> > clumsy code.
>>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>>>> > schemata from the API.
>>>> >
>>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> >> Benson,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> thanks,
>>>> >> dims
>>>> >>
>>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>>> >>> that activity?
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Daniel Kulp
>>> dkulp@apache.org
>>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1, to be formal about it.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
> whatever the version that may turn out to be.
>
> thanks,
> -- dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>>> Benson,
>>>
>>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>>
>> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
>> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>> >
>>> > Some of these are:
>>> >
>>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>>> > 2) Improve performance.
>>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>>> > clumsy code.
>>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>>> > schemata from the API.
>>> >
>>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> >> Benson,
>>> >>
>>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>> >>
>>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>> >>
>>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>> >>
>>> >> thanks,
>>> >> dims
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>> >>> that activity?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Daniel Kulp
>> dkulp@apache.org
>> http://dankulp.com/blog
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 to start a 1.4.X branch and use trunk for active development
whatever the version that may turn out to be.
thanks,
-- dims
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> Benson,
>>
>> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
>> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>
> Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
> (for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
>
> Dan
>
>
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
>> >
>> > Some of these are:
>> >
>> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>> > 2) Improve performance.
>> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>> > clumsy code.
>> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>> > schemata from the API.
>> >
>> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >> Benson,
>> >>
>> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
>> >>
>> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>> >>
>> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
>> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>> >>
>> >> thanks,
>> >> dims
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>> >>>
>> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>> >>> that activity?
>> >>>
>> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>> >>>
>> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>> >>>
>> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org
> http://dankulp.com/blog
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 5:08:21 pm Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> Benson,
>
> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
Yea. I would think there should be a 1.4.x branch for fixing 1.4.x issues
(for both Axis and CXF and others) and let trunk start heading toward 2.0.
Dan
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > From the message I sent on 30 October:
> >
> > Some of these are:
> >
> > 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
> > 2) Improve performance.
> > 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
> > not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
> > schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
> > clumsy code.
> > 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
> > and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
> > representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
> > schemata from the API.
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >> Benson,
> >>
> >> #1) Please use the trunk.
> >>
> >> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
> >>
> >> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
> >> site, you can check that into svn as well
> >> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
> >> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
> >> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
> >>
> >> thanks,
> >> dims
> >>
> >> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
> >>>
> >>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
> >>>
> >>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
> >>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
> >>> that activity?
> >>>
> >>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
> >>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
> >>>
> >>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
> >>>
> >>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
> >>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
> >>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
> >>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
> >>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org
http://dankulp.com/blog
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
That would make sense to me, as I've seen other projects use the trunk
for 'the next big thing' and branches for ongoing support. Would you
think that a point release pointing at CXF would come off of that
trunk (via copying and labelling) or would that be a matter of
cooperating with the Axis2 effort?
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Benson,
>
> Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
> and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> From the message I sent on 30 October:
>>
>> Some of these are:
>>
>> 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
>> 2) Improve performance.
>> 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
>> not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
>> schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
>> clumsy code.
>> 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
>> and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
>> representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
>> schemata from the API.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Benson,
>>>
>>> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>>
>>> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>>
>>> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>>> site, you can check that into svn as well
>>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>>> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>>> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dims
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>>
>>>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>>
>>>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>>> that activity?
>>>>
>>>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>>
>>>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>>
>>>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Benson,
Would it be better to switch Axis2 to a released version of XmlSchema
and let you work on trunk? That would work as well.
thanks,
dims
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 5:02 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From the message I sent on 30 October:
>
> Some of these are:
>
> 1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
> 2) Improve performance.
> 3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
> not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
> schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
> clumsy code.
> 4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
> and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
> representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
> schemata from the API.
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Benson,
>>
>> #1) Please use the trunk.
>>
>> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>>
>> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
>> site, you can check that into svn as well
>> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
>> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
>> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>>
>> thanks,
>> dims
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>>
>>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>>
>>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>>> that activity?
>>>
>>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>>
>>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>>
>>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com>.
>From the message I sent on 30 October:
Some of these are:
1) Move to Java 5 and use Generics to reduce the cast burden.
2) Improve performance.
3) Make the API more friendly to building schema from scratch. It's
not like it's impossible, but there are a number of areas involving
schema collections where the current situation leads us to slow and
clumsy code.
4) Move the class model closer to the abstract data model of XmlSchema
and further away from just representing the surface form of the XML
representation. In particular, make it harder to create invalid
schemata from the API.
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Benson,
>
> #1) Please use the trunk.
>
> #2) please make a new branch from trunk.
>
> #3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
> site, you can check that into svn as well
> (https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
> and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
> (/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>>
>> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>>
>> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
>> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
>> that activity?
>>
>> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
>> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>>
>> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>>
>> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
>> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
>> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
>> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
>> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
>
Re: XmlSchema activities
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
Benson,
#1) Please use the trunk.
#2) please make a new branch from trunk.
#3) Please make appropriate changes in svn. Once you generate the web
site, you can check that into svn as well
(https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/commons/site/XmlSchema)
and then log into minotaur and do an svn up here
(/www/ws.apache.org/commons/XmlSchema)
thanks,
dims
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Benson Margulies <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you all for voting me in as a committer.
>
> I have three pieces of work I'd like to get started on.
>
> 1) I'd like to apply the outstanding CXF-related patches and then see
> if I can't make a release. What would the appropriate branch be for
> that activity?
>
> 2) I'd like to start the '2.0' branch, as proposed in previous email.
> It will be a while before that is anything but snapshots.
>
> 3) I'd like to spruce up the website.
>
> The POM for XmlSchema has a very old list of committers in it. In the
> 2.0 branch, at least, I'd like to replace that with a pointer to this
> group. However, if people would rather be listed as individuals,
> please send me, or post here, current, working email addresses to
> replace the busted ones that are currently in the pom.
>
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com