Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

[Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>]

Andrew McIntyre wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2007 3:50 PM, Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>   
>> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>>     
>>> On Nov 27, 2007 9:19 AM, Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> Please test and vote on the 10.3.2.0 release candidate available at:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/derby10.3.2.0.598453/
>>>>
>>>> polls will close Thursday December 6, 2007 at 5:00PM PST.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> I found a small problem with the -src distribution.
>>>       
>> Andrew, do you think we need to recreate the release candidate for this?
>>     
>
> I think this kind of license-type issue is best handled as soon as it
> comes up.
I think I will go ahead and roll a new release candidate to pick up 
Andrew's change.  I am canceling the vote.  Please hold off on checking 
into 10.3 today until I get it posted.

Kathey

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

[Knut Anders Hatlen <Kn...@Sun.COM>]

Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> writes:

> Jean T. Anderson wrote:
>> I think we must include Andrew's change. Since this is primarily an
>> administrative change, would it be possible to update the existing
>> release to only include this change?
>>
> There is a problem with the release process that you have to update to
> the latest to create the release or the sysinfo output is a range
> instead of a version,

Alternatively you could create a 10.3.2 branch from the revision of the
first release candidate and merge the single fix from 10.3 to
10.3.2. Not saying you should, only that you could if such a need ever
arises.

-- 
Knut Anders

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

[Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>]

Laura Stewart wrote:
> Kathey -
>
> What time today do you expect to create the next release candidate?
>
>   
I think within the next hour. I am just finishing up  a sanity test run 
(so far so good).
If you are eager to get at it, it sits at:
 http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/derby10.3.2.1.599110/

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

[Laura Stewart <sc...@gmail.com>]

Kathey -

What time today do you expect to create the next release candidate?

-- 
Laura Stewart

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

[Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net>]

Jean T. Anderson wrote:
> I think we must include Andrew's change. Since this is primarily an 
> administrative change, would it be possible to update the existing 
> release to only include this change?
>
There is a problem with the release process that you have to update to 
the latest to create the release or the sysinfo output is a range 
instead of a version, so we will pick up all 10.3 changes since the 
first release candidate. Besides the backout of DERBY-3083 needs to go 
in as well, so it should all work out.

Kathey

Re: [CANCELLED] [VOTE] 10.3.2 release

["Jean T. Anderson" <jt...@fastmail.fm>]

Kathey Marsden wrote:
> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>> On Nov 27, 2007 3:50 PM, Kathey Marsden <km...@sbcglobal.net> 
>> wrote:
>>  
>>> Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>>>    
>>>> On Nov 27, 2007 9:19 AM, Kathey Marsden 
>>>> <km...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>> Please test and vote on the 10.3.2.0 release candidate available at:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~kmarsden/derby10.3.2.0.598453/
>>>>>
>>>>> polls will close Thursday December 6, 2007 at 5:00PM PST.
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>> I found a small problem with the -src distribution.
>>>>       
>>> Andrew, do you think we need to recreate the release candidate for 
>>> this?
>>>     
>>
>> I think this kind of license-type issue is best handled as soon as it
>> comes up.
> I think I will go ahead and roll a new release candidate to pick up 
> Andrew's change.  I am canceling the vote.  Please hold off on 
> checking into 10.3 today until I get it posted.
I think we must include Andrew's change. Since this is primarily an 
administrative change, would it be possible to update the existing 
release to only include this change?

 -jean