apply continuum patch?

["Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>]

[accidentally sent previously to maven list]
 
I submitted a patch a while ago to make continuum compatible with sql
server. It simply reduces the size of fields that where 8192 to 8000
bytes. Is this acceptable to commit?
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-697
 
Thanks,
Brian

Re: apply continuum patch?

[Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>]

Sounds like an excellent suggestion, thanks Erik!

- Brett

On 13/01/2007, at 9:08 PM, Erik Bengtson wrote:

> You could also use different mapping files for specific databases,  
> like
>
> package.jdo
> package-mssql.orm (8000)
> package-derby.orm (8192)
>
> In the pmf set the value: javax.jdo.option.Mapping=mssql
>
> And make sure you dont store data larger than 8182, otherwise it  
> will get
> truncated or fail to insert (as happened before)
>
> Quoting "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>:
>
>> [accidentally sent previously to maven list]
>>
>> I submitted a patch a while ago to make continuum compatible with sql
>> server. It simply reduces the size of fields that where 8192 to 8000
>> bytes. Is this acceptable to commit?
>> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-697
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Brian
>>
>
>

Re: apply continuum patch?

[Erik Bengtson <er...@jpox.org>]

You could also use different mapping files for specific databases, like

package.jdo
package-mssql.orm (8000)
package-derby.orm (8192)

In the pmf set the value: javax.jdo.option.Mapping=mssql

And make sure you dont store data larger than 8182, otherwise it will get
truncated or fail to insert (as happened before)

Quoting "Brian E. Fox" <br...@reply.infinity.nu>:

> [accidentally sent previously to maven list]
>
> I submitted a patch a while ago to make continuum compatible with sql
> server. It simply reduces the size of fields that where 8192 to 8000
> bytes. Is this acceptable to commit?
> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/CONTINUUM-697
>
> Thanks,
> Brian
>