You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to user@lucy.apache.org by Nick Wellnhofer <we...@aevum.de> on 2016/06/01 11:11:56 UTC

Re: [lucy-user] Error Compiling Lucy

On 01/06/2016 00:31, Milind Gupta wrote:
> One interesting thing is that if I try to compile it
> on the new Ubuntu Bash on Windows 10 it fails because of the include file
> not found error that I reported earlier. It compiles fine on a real Ubuntu
> system.

I never heard about the Ubuntu Bash on Windows 10 before. Thanks for bringing 
it up. This seems to be an "insider" feature for now. As soon as it is 
generally available, I'll have a look.

https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/commandline/wsl/about

Nick

Re: [lucy-user] Error Compiling Lucy

Posted by Marvin Humphrey <ma...@rectangular.com>.

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Nick Wellnhofer <we...@aevum.de> wrote:
> On 01/06/2016 00:31, Milind Gupta wrote:
>>
>> One interesting thing is that if I try to compile it
>> on the new Ubuntu Bash on Windows 10 it fails because of the include file
>> not found error that I reported earlier. It compiles fine on a real Ubuntu
>> system.
>
>
> I never heard about the Ubuntu Bash on Windows 10 before. Thanks for
> bringing it up. This seems to be an "insider" feature for now. As soon as it
> is generally available, I'll have a look.
>
> https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/commandline/wsl/about

There was a discussion on Hacker News yesterday.  A lot of people
seemed to think it was too buggy for general use at this time.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11798821

Marvin Humphrey