You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@iceberg.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/01/29 01:08:23 UTC

[GitHub] [iceberg] rdblue commented on pull request #3981: generics and associated tests - no literals

rdblue commented on pull request #3981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/iceberg/pull/3981#issuecomment-1024788880


   @emkornfield, I just had a discussion with @CircArgs about this yesterday. I think that we're currently evaluating whether integration with Python's type system is necessary and worth the additional complexity. It seems like the main benefit is to be able to have functions like transforms that accept a certain argument type and to make the literals conform to that type. But given how we will process actual data (and not just literal values in in expressions) won't use type safety because the data is in a dataframe or some direct representation (like a python int rather than a wrapper around int), it seems fairly limited.
   
   I think we may want to go with a simpler type implementation, but @CircArgs was going to give it some thought and weigh in.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@iceberg.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@iceberg.apache.org