You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2020/01/22 17:05:21 UTC

[GitHub] [nifi] markap14 opened a new pull request #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…

markap14 opened a new pull request #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4007
 
 
   …t in the SocketLoadBalancedFlowFileQueue. Even though the queue's setPriorities method was called, the underlying  may not have contained the localPartition. As a result, when setPriorities() was called, it did not properly delegate that call to . As a result, the queue knew that the Prioritizers were set but the local queue did not apply them. This happened due to a race condition between queue creation and NodeClusterCoordinator learning the Local Node Identifier. Additionally, updated NodeClusterCoordinator so that it will persist its state when it does learn the Local Node Identifier, as that was not being persisted. In testing this, also encounterd a deadlock in a particular Integration Test that was run, around AbstractFlowFileQueue and its synchronization. Because the 'synchronized' keyword synchronizes on 'this' and the concrete implementation also uses 'synchronized' and the result is the same 'this', a deadlock can occur that is difficult to understand. As a result, refactored AbstractFlowFileQueue to instead use read/write locks.
   
   Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
   
   Please provide a short description of the PR here:
   
   #### Description of PR
   
   _Enables X functionality; fixes bug NIFI-YYYY._
   
   In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
   to ensure the following steps have been taken:
   
   ### For all changes:
   - [ ] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced 
        in the commit message?
   
   - [ ] Does your PR title start with **NIFI-XXXX** where XXXX is the JIRA number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-" character.
   
   - [ ] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target branch (typically `master`)?
   
   - [ ] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? _Additional commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and pushed to allow change tracking. Do not `squash` or use `--force` when pushing to allow for clean monitoring of changes._
   
   ### For code changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn -Pcontrib-check clean install` at the root `nifi` folder?
   - [ ] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
   - [ ] Have you verified that the full build is successful on both JDK 8 and JDK 11?
   - [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF 2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)? 
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE` file, including the main `LICENSE` file under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `NOTICE` file, including the main `NOTICE` file found under `nifi-assembly`?
   - [ ] If adding new Properties, have you added `.displayName` in addition to .name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
   
   ### For documentation related changes:
   - [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which it is rendered?
   
   ### Note:
   Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check travis-ci for build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] [nifi] asfgit closed pull request #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
asfgit closed pull request #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4007
 
 
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

[GitHub] [nifi] joewitt commented on issue #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…

Posted by GitBox <gi...@apache.org>.
joewitt commented on issue #4007: NIFI-7059: Fixed bug that results in priorities not properly being se…
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4007#issuecomment-577335504
 
 
   +1 will merge to master

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services