You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Chris <cp...@earthlink.net> on 2005/11/30 04:34:08 UTC

Spamassassin and Mailing Lists

One of the mailing lists I belong to has since the 15th started using SA 
3.0.4 and since then all pgp signatures have been as attachments instead of 
in-line as they were in previous years.  Is there a setting in SA that 
could be causing this?  Today I finally got them to remove the 
x-no-archive:yes so that the list will again be archived at TheAimsGroup, 
now I need to get them to do something about the signature as an 
attachment.

Thanks

-- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
21:30:07 up 5 days, 6:09, 2 users, load average: 0.99, 1.19, 1.17
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk

Re: Spamassassin and Mailing Lists

Posted by Chris <cp...@earthlink.net>.
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 10:18 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 10:34 PM 11/29/2005, Chris wrote:
> >One of the mailing lists I belong to has since the 15th started using
> > SA=20 3.0.4 and since then all pgp signatures have been as attachments
> > instead of= =20
> >in-line as they were in previous years.  Is there a setting in SA
> > that=20 could be causing this?
>
> No.
>
> The only time SA modifies the body of a message is when it tags it as
> spam. Period.
>
> Now, the list could have also switched a whole lot of other software bits
> when they added SA, which is likely the cause.

Thanks Matt, appreciate the reply.

-- 
Chris
Registered Linux User 283774 http://counter.li.org
22:29:52 up 5 days, 7:09, 1 user, load average: 1.24, 1.31, 2.69
Mandriva Linux 10.1 Official, kernel 2.6.8.1-12mdk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If a program actually fits in memory and has enough disk space, it is 
guaranteed to crash. 
	-- Murphy's Computer Laws n°5
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Re: Spamassassin and Mailing Lists

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>.
At 10:34 PM 11/29/2005, Chris wrote:
>One of the mailing lists I belong to has since the 15th started using SA=20
>3.0.4 and since then all pgp signatures have been as attachments instead of=
>=20
>in-line as they were in previous years.  Is there a setting in SA that=20
>could be causing this?

No.

The only time SA modifies the body of a message is when it tags it as spam. 
Period.

Now, the list could have also switched a whole lot of other software bits 
when they added SA, which is likely the cause.