You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Dag H. Wanvik (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/11 01:53:51 UTC

[jira] Closed: (DERBY-4184) Calling deleteRow() on a ResultSet that has been commited throws no error

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Dag H. Wanvik closed DERBY-4184.
--------------------------------


> Calling deleteRow() on a ResultSet that has been commited throws no error
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4184
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4184
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
>         Environment: Not relevant.
>            Reporter: Tiago R. Espinha
>            Assignee: Dag H. Wanvik
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: ReproHoldCursorBug.java, ReproHoldCursorBug_OK.java
>
>
> This issue was originally found on DERBY-3839.
> The steps to get this error happening are as follows:
> 1) Set auto commit to false
> 2) Create a Statement with the following parameters:
> ResultSet.TYPE_SCROLL_INSENSITIVE, ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE and ResultSet.HOLD_CURSORS_OVER_COMMIT
> 3) Create a ResultSet by having a SELECT on an executeQuery() on a table with at least one row.
> 4) Do a next(); on the ResultSet. Then commit() and try to deleteRow() on the ResultSet.
> According to holdCursorJDBC30.out, the deleteRow() should throw an 'Invalid cursor state - no current row' but it doesn't, not when using Java code.
> The problem here is the ResultSet.CONCUR_UPDATABLE. By setting this property, the ResultSet checks that the property is different from CONCUR_READ_ONLY and doesn't do a proper check on checkForUpdatableResultSet(). Without this check, the deleteRow() executes successfully BUT, the row does NOT get deleted.
> After talking about this with Kathey, we agreed that the exception should always happen. If an exception isn't thrown and the row isn't deleted, then this is certainly misleading

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.