You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-dev@lucene.apache.org by "Yonik Seeley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/05/13 23:44:45 UTC

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (SOLR-1165) use skipping on filters to improve search performance

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1165?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12709138#action_12709138 ] 

Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-1165 at 5/13/09 2:44 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Leapfrogging a filter and a scorer has been done in Lucene since 2.4.
We'll get it for free if we start using a Lucene Filter (which means we need the docids in sorted order)

The other benefit of using Filter is that score() won't be called for items that don't match the filter... important for expensive functions (like geo distance functions, etc).

      was (Author: yseeley@gmail.com):
    Leapfrogging a filter and a scorer has been done in Lucene since 2.4.
We'll get it for free if we start using a Lucene Filter (which means we need the docids in sorted order)

  
> use skipping on filters to improve search performance
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-1165
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1165
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Yonik Seeley
>            Assignee: Yonik Seeley
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> Solr should use filters to skip scorers to improve search performance.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.