You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Wei ZHOU <us...@gmail.com> on 2013/05/13 19:38:20 UTC
Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Thanks, Paul.
Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands
Nicolas listed in Description?
2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13656100#comment-13656100]
>
> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an advanced
> zone with security groups.
>
> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>
> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>
> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the option to
> add/configure a public network.
>
> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
> > URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
> > Project: CloudStack
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
> > Priority: Blocker
> > Fix For: 4.1.0
> >
> >
> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a new
> secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Zone 1
> is ready to launch secondary storage VM
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> No running secondary storage vms found in datacenter id=1, starting one
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new secondary
> storage vm
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Assign
> secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request from data
> center : 1
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type Guest
> when expect to find 1
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks of
> type Guest when expect to find 1
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStorageVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:317)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.runPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> > We try this patch :
> > diff --git
> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java
> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java
> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
> > ---
> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java
> > +++
> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java
> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl extends
> ManagerBase implements Secondar
> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
> > }
> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl extends
> ManagerBase implements Secondar
> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && (dc.getNetworkType()
> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest && (dc.getNetworkType()
> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
> > Then the error :
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new secondary
> storage vm
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) Assign
> secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request from data
> center : 1
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type Public
> when expect to find 1
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks of
> type Public when expect to find 1
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStorageVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:33)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:81)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:317)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.access$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.runPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.run(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> > Into database :
> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1 and
> state <> 'DESTROY';
> > +--------------+
> > | traffic_type |
> > +--------------+
> > | Management |
> > | Control |
> > | Storage |
> > | Guest |
> > +--------------+
> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where data_center_id
> = 1 group by traffic_type;
> > +----+--------------+
> > | nb | traffic_type |
> > +----+--------------+
> > | 1 | Control |
> > | 25 | Guest |
> > | 1 | Management |
> > | 1 | Storage |
> > +----+--------------+
> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1 and
> state <> 'DESTROY';
> > +--------------+
> > | traffic_type |
> > +--------------+
> > | Management |
> > | Control |
> > | Storage |
> > | Guest |
> > +--------------+
> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where data_center_id =
> 1 group by traffic_type;
> > +-----+--------------+
> > | nb | traffic_type |
> > +-----+--------------+
> > | 1 | Control |
> > | 362 | Guest |
> > | 1 | Management |
> > | 1 | Storage |
> > +-----+--------------+
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Posted by Chip Childers <ch...@sungard.com>.
Jessica,
How is this patch coming along?
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I'll remove this option (Advance zone with SG) from UI in 4.1 branch.
> Will submit a patch soon.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:46 PM
> To: Alena Prokharchyk; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
> Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>
> Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
>
> Anthony
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alena Prokharchyk
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>
> Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
>
> * no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided
> * 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for SG enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be reverted as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there.
>
>
> -Alena.
>
>
>
> On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
>>Done. :)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Paul Angus
>>S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
>>paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweizhou@gmail.com]
>>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
>>network with security groups)
>>
>>Thanks, Paul.
>>
>>Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands
>>Nicolas listed in Description?
>>
>>
>>2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>>
>>>
>>> [
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlass
>>> i
>>> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentI
>>> d
>>> =13656100#comment-13656100]
>>>
>>> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
>>> ----------------------------------------
>>>
>>> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an
>>> advanced zone with security groups.
>>>
>>> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>>>
>>> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
>>> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>>>
>>> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
>>> option to add/configure a public network.
>>>
>>> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
>>> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>>> >
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> -
>>> --------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
>>> > URL:
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
>>> > Project: CloudStack
>>> > Issue Type: Bug
>>> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is
>>> > the
>>> default.)
>>> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>>> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
>>> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
>>> > Priority: Blocker
>>> > Fix For: 4.1.0
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a
>>> new secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
>>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM
>>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
>>> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>>> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in
>>> datacenter id=1, starting one
>>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>>> secondary storage vm
>>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>>> from data center : 1
>>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type
>>> Guest when expect to find 1
>>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks
>>> > of
>>> type Guest when expect to find 1
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>>> a
>>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>>> n
>>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>>> (
>>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>>> c
>>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>>> i
>>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>>> i
>>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>>> 4
>>> )
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>>> 3
>>> 3)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>>> 81)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>>> 1
>>> )
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>>> 317)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> a
>>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> r
>>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> r
>>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>>> u
>>> tor.java:886)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>>> java:908)
>>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>>> > We try this patch :
>>> > diff --git
>>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>>> j
>>> ava
>>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>>> j
>>> ava
>>> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
>>> > ---
>>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>>> j
>>> ava
>>> > +++
>>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>>> j
>>> ava
>>> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>>> > extends
>>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>>> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
>>> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
>>> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
>>> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
>>> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
>>> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
>>> > }
>>> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>>> > extends
>>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>>> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
>>> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
>>> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
>>> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
>>> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>>> > (dc.getNetworkType()
>>> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
>>> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>>> > + || (dc.getNetworkType()
>>> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
>>> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
>>> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
>>> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
>>> > Then the error :
>>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>>> secondary storage vm
>>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
>>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>>> from data center : 1
>>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type
>>> Public when expect to find 1
>>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks
>>> > of
>>> type Public when expect to find 1
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>>> a
>>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>>> n
>>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>>> (
>>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>>> c
>>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>>> i
>>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>>> i
>>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>>> 4
>>> )
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>>> 3
>>> 3)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>>> 81)
>>> > at
>>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>>> 1
>>> )
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>>> 317)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> a
>>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> r
>>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>>> r
>>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>>> u
>>> tor.java:886)
>>> > at
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>>> java:908)
>>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>>> > Into database :
>>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>>> > 1 and
>>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > | traffic_type |
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > | Management |
>>> > | Control |
>>> > | Storage |
>>> > | Guest |
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>>> > data_center_id
>>> = 1 group by traffic_type;
>>> > +----+--------------+
>>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>>> > +----+--------------+
>>> > | 1 | Control |
>>> > | 25 | Guest |
>>> > | 1 | Management |
>>> > | 1 | Storage |
>>> > +----+--------------+
>>> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
>>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>>> > 1 and
>>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > | traffic_type |
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > | Management |
>>> > | Control |
>>> > | Storage |
>>> > | Guest |
>>> > +--------------+
>>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>>> > data_center_id =
>>> 1 group by traffic_type;
>>> > +-----+--------------+
>>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>>> > +-----+--------------+
>>> > | 1 | Control |
>>> > | 362 | Guest |
>>> > | 1 | Management |
>>> > | 1 | Storage |
>>> > +-----+--------------+
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
>>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>>
>>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>>Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>>not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
>>If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither
>>take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
>>Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>>Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
>>ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>>
>>
>
>
>
RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Posted by Jessica Wang <Je...@citrix.com>.
I'll remove this option (Advance zone with SG) from UI in 4.1 branch.
Will submit a patch soon.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anthony Xu [mailto:Xuefei.Xu@citrix.com]
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:46 PM
To: Alena Prokharchyk; dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers
Subject: RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
* no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided
* 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for SG enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be reverted as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there.
-Alena.
On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>Done. :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Paul Angus
>S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
>paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweizhou@gmail.com]
>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
>network with security groups)
>
>Thanks, Paul.
>
>Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands
>Nicolas listed in Description?
>
>
>2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlass
>> i
>> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentI
>> d
>> =13656100#comment-13656100]
>>
>> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an
>> advanced zone with security groups.
>>
>> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>>
>> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
>> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>>
>> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
>> option to add/configure a public network.
>>
>> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
>> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > URL:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > Project: CloudStack
>> > Issue Type: Bug
>> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is
>> > the
>> default.)
>> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
>> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
>> > Priority: Blocker
>> > Fix For: 4.1.0
>> >
>> >
>> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a
>> new secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
>> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in
>> datacenter id=1, starting one
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type
>> Guest when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks
>> > of
>> type Guest when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>> a
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>> n
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>> (
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>> c
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>> 4
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>> 1
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>> u
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > We try this patch :
>> > diff --git
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
>> > ---
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > +++
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>> > extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
>> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
>> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
>> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
>> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
>> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
>> > }
>> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>> > extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
>> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
>> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
>> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
>> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
>> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > + || (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
>> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
>> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
>> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
>> > Then the error :
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type
>> Public when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks
>> > of
>> type Public when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>> a
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>> n
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>> (
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>> c
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>> 4
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>> 1
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>> u
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > Into database :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>> > 1 and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id
>> = 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 25 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>> > 1 and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id =
>> 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 362 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
>If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither
>take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
>Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
>ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Posted by Anthony Xu <Xu...@citrix.com>.
Advance zone with SG is not in 4.1.
Anthony
-----Original Message-----
From: Alena Prokharchyk
Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 1:37 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Chip Childers; Anthony Xu
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
* no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided
* 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for SG enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be reverted as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there.
-Alena.
On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>Done. :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Paul Angus
>S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
>paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweizhou@gmail.com]
>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
>network with security groups)
>
>Thanks, Paul.
>
>Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands
>Nicolas listed in Description?
>
>
>2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlass
>> i
>> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentI
>> d
>> =13656100#comment-13656100]
>>
>> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an
>> advanced zone with security groups.
>>
>> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>>
>> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
>> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>>
>> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
>> option to add/configure a public network.
>>
>> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
>> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> -
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > URL:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > Project: CloudStack
>> > Issue Type: Bug
>> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is
>> > the
>> default.)
>> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
>> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
>> > Priority: Blocker
>> > Fix For: 4.1.0
>> >
>> >
>> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a
>> new secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
>> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in
>> datacenter id=1, starting one
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type
>> Guest when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks
>> > of
>> type Guest when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>> a
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>> n
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>> (
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>> c
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>> 4
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>> 1
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>> u
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > We try this patch :
>> > diff --git
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
>> > ---
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > +++
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.
>> j
>> ava
>> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>> > extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
>> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
>> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
>> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
>> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
>> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
>> > }
>> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>> > extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
>> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
>> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
>> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
>> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
>> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > + || (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
>> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
>> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
>> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
>> > Then the error :
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> No stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type
>> Public when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks
>> > of
>> type Public when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStor
>> a
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Seco
>> n
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity
>> (
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Se
>> c
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Prem
>> i
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:10
>> 4
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:44
>> 1
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.
>> r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExec
>> u
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > Into database :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>> > 1 and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id
>> = 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 25 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id =
>> > 1 and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id =
>> 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 362 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are
>intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed.
>Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do
>not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
>If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither
>take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone.
>Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
>ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Posted by Alena Prokharchyk <Al...@citrix.com>.
Anthony, do we even support Advance zone with SG in 4.1? I thought you've
checked it in in 4.2 only. If this is true, then:
* no upgrade support for SG enabled setups to 4.1 should be provided
* 4.1 UI shouldn't let you create Advance zone with SG enabled. If UI for
SG enabled Advance zone was somehow merged to 4.1 branch, it should be
reverted as there is no backend/db upgrade support exist there.
-Alena.
On 5/13/13 1:10 PM, "Paul Angus" <pa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>Done. :)
>
>Regards,
>
>Paul Angus
>S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
>paul.angus@shapeblue.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweizhou@gmail.com]
>Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
>To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to
>4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced
>network with security groups)
>
>Thanks, Paul.
>
>Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands
>Nicolas listed in Description?
>
>
>2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlassi
>> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId
>> =13656100#comment-13656100]
>>
>> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
>> ----------------------------------------
>>
>> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an
>> advanced zone with security groups.
>>
>> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>>
>> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
>> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>>
>> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
>> option to add/configure a public network.
>>
>> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
>> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
>> >
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > URL:
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
>> > Project: CloudStack
>> > Issue Type: Bug
>> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
>> default.)
>> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
>> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
>> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
>> > Priority: Blocker
>> > Fix For: 4.1.0
>> >
>> >
>> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a new
>> secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
>> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
>> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in
>> datacenter id=1, starting one
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
>> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type
>> Guest when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks
>> > of
>> type Guest when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > We try this patch :
>> > diff --git
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
>> ava
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
>> ava
>> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
>> > ---
>> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
>> ava
>> > +++
>> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
>> ava
>> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
>> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
>> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
>> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
>> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
>> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
>> > }
>> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
>> > extends
>> ManagerBase implements Secondar
>> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
>> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
>> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
>> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
>> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
>> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
>> > + || (dc.getNetworkType()
>> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
>> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
>> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
>> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
>> > Then the error :
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
>> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
>> secondary storage vm
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
>> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
>> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
>> from data center : 1
>> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
>> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type
>> Public when expect to find 1
>> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks of
>> type Public when expect to find 1
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora
>> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon
>> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(
>> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec
>> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
>> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104
>> )
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3
>> 3)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
>> 81)
>> > at
>> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441
>> )
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
>> 317)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a
>> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
>> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
>> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu
>> tor.java:886)
>> > at
>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
>> java:908)
>> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
>> > Into database :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1
>> > and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id
>> = 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 25 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +----+--------------+
>> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
>> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1
>> > and
>> state <> 'DESTROY';
>> > +--------------+
>> > | traffic_type |
>> > +--------------+
>> > | Management |
>> > | Control |
>> > | Storage |
>> > | Guest |
>> > +--------------+
>> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
>> > data_center_id =
>> 1 group by traffic_type;
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | nb | traffic_type |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>> > | 1 | Control |
>> > | 362 | Guest |
>> > | 1 | Management |
>> > | 1 | Storage |
>> > +-----+--------------+
>>
>> --
>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
>> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
>> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>>
>This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended
>solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views
>or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not
>necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If
>you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take
>any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please
>contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error.
>Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue
>Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
>ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.
>
>
RE: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0
failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with
security groups)
Posted by Paul Angus <pa...@shapeblue.com>.
Done. :)
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784
paul.angus@shapeblue.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweizhou@gmail.com]
Sent: 13 May 2013 18:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-2463) CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
Thanks, Paul.
Could you login to the database and paste the result of the commands Nicolas listed in Description?
2013/5/13 Paul Angus (JIRA) <ji...@apache.org>
>
> [
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463?page=com.atlassi
> an.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId
> =13656100#comment-13656100]
>
> Paul Angus commented on CLOUDSTACK-2463:
> ----------------------------------------
>
> On a clean build of ACS4.1-SNAPSHOT from 13/05/13 I created an
> advanced zone with security groups.
>
> When attempting to enable the zone I received the following message:
>
> 'Cannot enable this Zone since: Unable to find the default physical
> network with traffic=Public in the specified zone id'
>
> As it was an advanced zone with security groups I didn't get the
> option to add/configure a public network.
>
> > CS Upgrade 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 failed due to no public network found
> (configuration : advanced network with security groups)
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Key: CLOUDSTACK-2463
> > URL:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2463
> > Project: CloudStack
> > Issue Type: Bug
> > Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> > Affects Versions: 4.1.0
> > Reporter: Nicolas Lamirault
> > Assignee: Wei Zhou
> > Priority: Blocker
> > Fix For: 4.1.0
> >
> >
> > According Wei Zhou last patch (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528), i can add a new
> secondary storage. The SSVM creation failed due to :
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,868 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Zone 1 is ready to launch secondary storage VM
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,879 INFO
> [cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl]
> (secstorage-1:null) No running secondary storage vms found in
> datacenter id=1, starting one
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,889 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
> secondary storage vm
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,894 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
> from data center : 1
> > 2013-05-13 15:17:52,922 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 22 networks of type
> Guest when expect to find 1
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 22 networks
> > of
> type Guest when expect to find 1
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora
> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:552)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon
> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(
> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:666)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec
> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1300)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104
> )
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3
> 3)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
> 81)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441
> )
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
> 317)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a
> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu
> tor.java:886)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:908)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> > We try this patch :
> > diff --git
> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
> ava
> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
> ava
> > index fca89dc..d40d22f 100755
> > ---
> a/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
> ava
> > +++
> b/server/src/com/cloud/storage/secondary/SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.j
> ava
> > @@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl extends
> ManagerBase implements Secondar
> > DataCenter dc = _dcDao.findById(plan.getDataCenterId());
> > TrafficType defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Public;
> > - if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic ||
> dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()) {
> > + if (dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Basic) {
> > defaultTrafficType = TrafficType.Guest;
> > }
> > @@ -1143,7 +1143,7 @@ public class SecondaryStorageManagerImpl
> > extends
> ManagerBase implements Secondar
> > List<NicProfile> nics = profile.getNics();
> > for (NicProfile nic : nics) {
> > if ((nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Public &&
> dc.getNetworkType() == NetworkType.Advanced)
> > - || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
> > (dc.getNetworkType()
> == NetworkType.Basic || dc.isSecurityGroupEnabled()))) {
> > + || (nic.getTrafficType() == TrafficType.Guest &&
> > + || (dc.getNetworkType()
> == NetworkType.Basic))) {
> > secVm.setPublicIpAddress(nic.getIp4Address());
> > secVm.setPublicNetmask(nic.getNetmask());
> > secVm.setPublicMacAddress(nic.getMacAddress());
> > Then the error :
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,084 INFO
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null) No
> stopped secondary storage vm is available, need to allocate a new
> secondary storage vm
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,090 DEBUG
> [storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl] (secstorage-1:null)
> Assign secondary storage vm from a newly started instance for request
> from data center : 1
> > 2013-05-13 16:56:27,126 WARN [cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner]
> (secstorage-1:null) Unexpected exception Found 0 networks of type
> Public when expect to find 1
> > com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Found 0 networks of
> type Public when expect to find 1
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.createSecStora
> geVmInstance(SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:555)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.startNew(Secon
> daryStorageManagerImpl.java:499)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.allocCapacity(
> SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:669)
> > at
> com.cloud.storage.secondary.SecondaryStorageManagerImpl.expandPool(Sec
> ondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:1304)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:121)
> > at
> com.cloud.secstorage.PremiumSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.scanPool(Premi
> umSecondaryStorageManagerImpl.java:52)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.loadScan(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:104
> )
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner.access$100(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:3
> 3)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.reallyRun(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:
> 81)
> > at
> com.cloud.vm.SystemVmLoadScanner$1.run(SystemVmLoadScanner.java:72)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:441
> )
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRunAndReset(FutureTask.java:
> 317)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.runAndReset(FutureTask.java:150)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.a
> ccess$101(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
> unPeriodic(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:180)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.r
> un(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:204)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecu
> tor.java:886)
> > at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.
> java:908)
> > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> > Into database :
> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1
> > and
> state <> 'DESTROY';
> > +--------------+
> > | traffic_type |
> > +--------------+
> > | Management |
> > | Control |
> > | Storage |
> > | Guest |
> > +--------------+
> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
> > data_center_id
> = 1 group by traffic_type;
> > +----+--------------+
> > | nb | traffic_type |
> > +----+--------------+
> > | 1 | Control |
> > | 25 | Guest |
> > | 1 | Management |
> > | 1 | Storage |
> > +----+--------------+
> > In our CS 2.2.13, we've got this configuration :
> > select distinct(traffic_type) from networks where data_center_id = 1
> > and
> state <> 'DESTROY';
> > +--------------+
> > | traffic_type |
> > +--------------+
> > | Management |
> > | Control |
> > | Storage |
> > | Guest |
> > +--------------+
> > select count(*) as nb, traffic_type from networks where
> > data_center_id =
> 1 group by traffic_type;
> > +-----+--------------+
> > | nb | traffic_type |
> > +-----+--------------+
> > | 1 | Control |
> > | 362 | Guest |
> > | 1 | Management |
> > | 1 | Storage |
> > +-----+--------------+
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA
> administrators For more information on JIRA, see:
> http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England & Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.