You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jmeter.apache.org by Felix Schumacher <fe...@internetallee.de> on 2015/01/06 16:20:05 UTC

Re: Unused constructor in Workbench

Am 28.12.2014 um 04:00 schrieb sebb:
> On 24 December 2014 at 13:08, Felix Schumacher
> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> in Workbench there is a constructor Workbench(String, boolean), which seems
>> not to be used anywhere and it ignores the second parameter.
>>
>> Should we mark that constructor as deprecated?
> I don't think we need to retain binary compatibility for the WorkBench
> class, so we could just drop the ctor.
Created a bugzilla entry 57418 and again the question: Where should I 
put the change in changes.xml? Incompatible?

Regards
  Felix
>
>> Regards
>>   Felix

Re: Unused constructor in Workbench

Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.

On 6 January 2015 at 15:20, Felix Schumacher
<fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
> Am 28.12.2014 um 04:00 schrieb sebb:
>
>> On 24 December 2014 at 13:08, Felix Schumacher
>> <fe...@internetallee.de> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> in Workbench there is a constructor Workbench(String, boolean), which
>>> seems
>>> not to be used anywhere and it ignores the second parameter.
>>>
>>> Should we mark that constructor as deprecated?
>>
>> I don't think we need to retain binary compatibility for the WorkBench
>> class, so we could just drop the ctor.
>
> Created a bugzilla entry 57418 and again the question: Where should I put
> the change in changes.xml? Incompatible?

Not incompatible, non-functional

> Regards
>  Felix
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>>   Felix
>
>