You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> on 2000/07/01 00:01:13 UTC
Re: Alpha 5
Nope. Release early, release often. I'll work on a release after the DAV is
up and running. If a5 happens to come out before then, well fine.
We are not in the "release often" mode right now. We should never hold up
for specific changes. Just release it. Those changes will appear in the next
release. Simple as that.
Slowing down a release cycle is only helpful for *final* releases. People
don't want to upgrade their 1.3.x servers every two weeks. But alphas?
Almost by definition, these are not production servers, but test/play/dev
servers. If thsoe people feel like picking up a new version, they will. No
harm in tossing another one out there. In fact, it can do a lot of good.
Cheers,
-g
On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 10:05:19PM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> If that's the case then maybe we should aim for Monday morning and give you
> time to get DAV working?
>
> david
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Greg Stein" <gs...@lyra.org>
> To: <ne...@apache.org>
> Sent: Thursday, June 29, 2000 7:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Alpha 5
>
>
> > On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 08:53:20AM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > > On Thu, 29 Jun 2000, David Reid wrote:
> > >
> > > > Then do we just need a date and a victim. Oh I mean an RM? :)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Yep, and it would be REALLY great if as soon as we have both we update
> the
> > > STATUS file.
> >
> > I'm going to work on mod_dav integration while Ryan reviews my response to
> > his challenege problem. Once I get the DAV stuff working, then I'll do it.
> > If somebody beats me to it, then great. I expect to get DAV limping very
> > late today, or tomorrow.
> >
> > Anybody out there who wants to RM *today* ?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -g
> >
> > --
> > Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
> >
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
Re: Alpha 5
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000, Ask Bjoern Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> > > I know it's a bit of effort but we've had a few changes to configuration
> > > and a wider airing might be in all of our best interests!
> >
> > Sorry about the recent commits, especially if this holds up the alpha. I
> > just wanted to fix a few bugs today. :-)
>
> what's the status of the bug system?
We are using GNATS for right now. When Brian finishes with newlocus, I
believe we will be talking again about bugzilla or the tigris system.
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Alpha 5
Posted by Ask Bjoern Hansen <as...@valueclick.com>.
On Fri, 30 Jun 2000 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> > I know it's a bit of effort but we've had a few changes to configuration
> > and a wider airing might be in all of our best interests!
>
> Sorry about the recent commits, especially if this holds up the alpha. I
> just wanted to fix a few bugs today. :-)
what's the status of the bug system?
- ask
--
ask bjoern hansen - <http://www.netcetera.dk/~ask/>
more than 70M impressions per day, <http://valueclick.com>
Re: Alpha 5
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
On Sat, 1 Jul 2000, David Reid wrote:
> I think someone volunteered, so shall we?
>
> I know it's a bit of effort but we've had a few changes to configuration
> and a wider airing might be in all of our best interests!
Sorry about the recent commits, especially if this holds up the alpha. I
just wanted to fix a few bugs today. :-)
Ryan
_______________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
406 29th St.
San Francisco, CA 94131
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Alpha 5
Posted by David Reid <da...@jetnet.co.uk>.
I think someone volunteered, so shall we?
I know it's a bit of effort but we've had a few changes to configuration
and a wider airing might be in all of our best interests!
david
>Nope. Release early, release often. I'll work on a release after the
DAV is
>up and running. If a5 happens to come out before then, well fine.
>
>We are not in the "release often" mode right now. We should never hold
up
>for specific changes. Just release it. Those changes will appear in the
next
>release. Simple as that.
>
>Slowing down a release cycle is only helpful for *final* releases.
People
>don't want to upgrade their 1.3.x servers every two weeks. But alphas?
>Almost by definition, these are not production servers, but
test/play/dev
>servers. If thsoe people feel like picking up a new version, they will.
No
>harm in tossing another one out there. In fact, it can do a lot of good.
>