You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/06/01 14:42:30 UTC

[GitHub] [flink] Myasuka commented on a diff in pull request #19861: [hotfix] [docs] Fix use cases for HashMapStateBackend

Myasuka commented on code in PR #19861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/19861#discussion_r886891675


##########
docs/content/docs/ops/state/state_backends.md:
##########
@@ -55,8 +55,7 @@ that store the values, triggers, etc.
 
 The HashMapStateBackend is encouraged for:
 
-  - Jobs with large state, long windows, large key/value states.
-  - All high-availability setups.
+  - Jobs with small state, short windows, small key/value states.

Review Comment:
   I think we'd better to say `not-very-large` instead of `small`.
   And moreover, `HashMapStateBackend` is certainly okay for `All high-availability setups`.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@flink.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org