You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@mesos.apache.org by Vinod Kone <vi...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/03 20:03:26 UTC

Re: Review Request 33241: docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#review86442
-----------------------------------------------------------



docs/home.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138454>

    I would call this file monitoring because it talks about metrics and alerts.
    
    [Monitoring] /documentation/latest/monitoring/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138451>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138450>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138449>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138448>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138447>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138446>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138430>

    Number of tasks that were invalid.



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138431>

    There are also fine grained metrics about task lost reasons. 
    
    e.g:
    
     master/task_failed/source_slave/reason_memory_limit 
     
    It is worth documenting these.



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138436>

    s/aborted/terminated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138438>

    s/used/allocated/
    
    this was a bad metric name. we will figure out how to rename it to allocated in the future.



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138440>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138441>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138442>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138444>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138445>

    s/used/allocated/



docs/metrics.md
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#comment138452>

    Can you add some basic alerts for slaves too like you did for master?


- Vinod Kone


On May 12, 2015, 8:43 p.m., Ricardo Cervera-Navarro wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 12, 2015, 8:43 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2621
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2621
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md 6ab61f85aa7d62e0f19267b886dffb4e0aa826ea 
>   docs/metrics.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - Previewed in markdown editor.
> - Replaced page content using the Element Inspector in Chrome to ensure that the tables look good.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> mesosmetrics2.webarchive
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/04/27/b89946c8-f709-4bca-b610-affd584c62f3__mesosmetrics2.webarchive
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ricardo Cervera-Navarro
> 
>


Re: Review Request 33241: docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.

Posted by Ricardo Cervera-Navarro <rc...@twopensource.com>.

> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/home.md, line 22
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956804#file956804line22>
> >
> >     I would call this file monitoring because it talks about metrics and alerts.
> >     
> >     [Monitoring] /documentation/latest/monitoring/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 69
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line69>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 76
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line76>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 90
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line90>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 97
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line97>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 111
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line111>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 118
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line118>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 364
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line364>
> >
> >     Number of tasks that were invalid.

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 417
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line417>
> >
> >     There are also fine grained metrics about task lost reasons. 
> >     
> >     e.g:
> >     
> >      master/task_failed/source_slave/reason_memory_limit 
> >      
> >     It is worth documenting these.

I don't have any more time to work on this assignment.


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 474
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line474>
> >
> >     s/aborted/terminated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 777
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line777>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/
> >     
> >     this was a bad metric name. we will figure out how to rename it to allocated in the future.

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 784
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line784>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 798
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line798>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 805
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line805>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 819
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line819>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 826
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line826>
> >
> >     s/used/allocated/

Done


> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 1057
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line1057>
> >
> >     Can you add some basic alerts for slaves too like you did for master?

I don't have any more time to work on this assignment.


- Ricardo


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#review86442
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 24, 2015, 9:28 a.m., Ricardo Cervera-Navarro wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 24, 2015, 9:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2621
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2621
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md 6ab61f85aa7d62e0f19267b886dffb4e0aa826ea 
>   docs/monitoring.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - Previewed in markdown editor.
> - Replaced page content using the Element Inspector in Chrome to ensure that the tables look good.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> mesosmetrics2.webarchive
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/04/27/b89946c8-f709-4bca-b610-affd584c62f3__mesosmetrics2.webarchive
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ricardo Cervera-Navarro
> 
>


Re: Review Request 33241: docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.

Posted by Joe Smith <ya...@gmail.com>.

> On June 3, 2015, 11:03 a.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> > docs/metrics.md, line 417
> > <https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/4/?file=956805#file956805line417>
> >
> >     There are also fine grained metrics about task lost reasons. 
> >     
> >     e.g:
> >     
> >      master/task_failed/source_slave/reason_memory_limit 
> >      
> >     It is worth documenting these.
> 
> Ricardo Cervera-Navarro wrote:
>     I don't have any more time to work on this assignment.

I think for adding more metrics we can lean on a new review + submitter- likely best to get this coverage in now (is my preference)


- Joe


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/#review86442
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 24, 2015, 9:28 a.m., Ricardo Cervera-Navarro wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 24, 2015, 9:28 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos.
> 
> 
> Bugs: MESOS-2621
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2621
> 
> 
> Repository: mesos
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> docs: Add documentation on observability metrics.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   docs/home.md 6ab61f85aa7d62e0f19267b886dffb4e0aa826ea 
>   docs/monitoring.md PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/33241/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> - Previewed in markdown editor.
> - Replaced page content using the Element Inspector in Chrome to ensure that the tables look good.
> 
> 
> File Attachments
> ----------------
> 
> mesosmetrics2.webarchive
>   https://reviews.apache.org/media/uploaded/files/2015/04/27/b89946c8-f709-4bca-b610-affd584c62f3__mesosmetrics2.webarchive
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ricardo Cervera-Navarro
> 
>