You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org> on 2016/01/31 19:19:26 UTC

Rules updated!

Hallelujah! We got a weekly masscheck with sufficient corpora to generate 
a rules update!

Thanks to everyone who contributed.

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   How do you argue with people to whom math is an opinion? -- Unknown
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tomorrow: the 13th anniversary of the loss of STS-107 Columbia

Re: Rules updated!

Posted by Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi>.
John Hardin kirjoitti 31.1.2016 22:12:
> On Sun, 31 Jan 2016, Jari Fredriksson wrote:
> 
>> John Hardin kirjoitti 31.1.2016 20:19:
>>>  Hallelujah! We got a weekly masscheck with sufficient corpora to
>>>  generate a rules update!
>>> 
>>>  Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>> 
>> hm, not according to ruleqa.spamassassin.org ...
>> 
>> I'm now still running the weekly as a late retry, but dunno it does 
>> anything.
> 
> I ran my get-latest-update script and it didn't tell me I was up to
> date. It downloaded this:
> 
> -rw-r--r-- 1 jhardin jhardin 277113 Jan 30 18:44 1727685.tar.gz
> 
> That's SVN revision # from the weekly masscheck.
> 
> I agree the ham corpus numbers here look too low:
> 
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20160130-r1727685-n
> 
> Not sure exactly what's going on.

Probably something connected to my activities. My auto-run was so much 
late that the script automagically selected nighty. That is seen as a 
"random" post in that page.

My very very late manual run for it just ended, and the result is posted 
now. It just does not show (yet?) on the page, but it may or may not 
show up later - dunno how.

status:  80% ham: 46203  spam: 31477  date: 2015-08-06   now: 2016-01-31 
22:03:57
status:  90% ham: 51977  spam: 35413  date: 2015-12-09   now: 2016-01-31 
22:14:01
status: completed run stage                              now: 2016-01-31 
22:22:27
+ LOGLIST=' ham-net-jarif.log spam-net-jarif.log'
+ set +x
Syncing weekly_mass_check
rsync -Pcqz  ham-net-jarif.log spam-net-jarif.log *munged*/

real	104m30.361s
user	0m0.230s
sys	0m0.180s
exiting @ Sun Jan 31 20:32:29 EET 2016
   Logical volume "lv_home_snapshot2" successfully removed

-- 
jarif.bit

Re: Rules updated!

Posted by John Hardin <jh...@impsec.org>.
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016, Jari Fredriksson wrote:

> John Hardin kirjoitti 31.1.2016 20:19:
>>  Hallelujah! We got a weekly masscheck with sufficient corpora to
>>  generate a rules update!
>>
>>  Thanks to everyone who contributed.
>
> hm, not according to ruleqa.spamassassin.org ...
>
> I'm now still running the weekly as a late retry, but dunno it does anything.

I ran my get-latest-update script and it didn't tell me I was up to date. 
It downloaded this:

-rw-r--r-- 1 jhardin jhardin 277113 Jan 30 18:44 1727685.tar.gz

That's SVN revision # from the weekly masscheck.

I agree the ham corpus numbers here look too low:

http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20160130-r1727685-n

Not sure exactly what's going on.

-- 
  John Hardin KA7OHZ                    http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
  jhardin@impsec.org    FALaholic #11174     pgpk -a jhardin@impsec.org
  key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C  AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
   Markley's Law (variant of Godwin's Law): As an online discussion
   of gun owners' rights grows longer, the probability of an ad hominem
   attack involving penis size approaches 1.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
  Tomorrow: the 13th anniversary of the loss of STS-107 Columbia

Re: Rules updated!

Posted by Jari Fredriksson <ja...@iki.fi>.
John Hardin kirjoitti 31.1.2016 20:19:
> Hallelujah! We got a weekly masscheck with sufficient corpora to
> generate a rules update!
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed.

hm, not according to ruleqa.spamassassin.org ...

I'm now still running the weekly as a late retry, but dunno it does 
anything.

-- 
jarif.bit