You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@deltaspike.apache.org by Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> on 2019/08/28 19:23:41 UTC
Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Hello,
I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
Thanks.
Re: Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
@mark:
+1!
regards,
gerhard
Am Do., 5. Sept. 2019 um 16:01 Uhr schrieb Mark Struberg
<st...@yahoo.de.invalid>:
>
> Probably we will require CDI-2.0 in the future. But there was simply no need so far.
> There was little gain and we would loose backward compatibility.
> But of course if there is a good argument and a feature we cannot implement without upgrading then we will likely do a 2.0.
> At least that's my $0.02
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> > Am 05.09.2019 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > tthanks for the answers .
> >
> > Yes work very good using cdi 2.0 .
> >
> > I just thought that the cdi 2.0 is default in 1.9.1
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Daniel Dias dos Santos*
> > Java Developer
> > SouJava & JCP Member
> > GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos
> > Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava
> >
> >
> > Em qui, 29 de ago de 2019 às 07:02, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> > escreveu:
> >
> >> +1
> >>
> >> There was really no need to support any feature after 1.0.
> >> We have a few things we call via reflection though.
> >>
> >> LieGrue,
> >> strub
> >>
> >>
> >> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> >>> Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0
> >>>
> >>> Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> schrieb am
> >> Mi.,
> >>> 28. Aug. 2019, 21:24:
> >>>
> >>>> Hello,
> >>>>
> >>>> I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
> >>>>
> >>>> Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks.
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
>
Re: Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
Probably we will require CDI-2.0 in the future. But there was simply no need so far.
There was little gain and we would loose backward compatibility.
But of course if there is a good argument and a feature we cannot implement without upgrading then we will likely do a 2.0.
At least that's my $0.02
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 05.09.2019 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi,
>
> tthanks for the answers .
>
> Yes work very good using cdi 2.0 .
>
> I just thought that the cdi 2.0 is default in 1.9.1
>
> --
>
> *Daniel Dias dos Santos*
> Java Developer
> SouJava & JCP Member
> GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos
> Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava
>
>
> Em qui, 29 de ago de 2019 às 07:02, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> escreveu:
>
>> +1
>>
>> There was really no need to support any feature after 1.0.
>> We have a few things we call via reflection though.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
>>> Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0
>>>
>>> Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> schrieb am
>> Mi.,
>>> 28. Aug. 2019, 21:24:
>>>
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
>>>>
>>>> Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>
>>
Re: Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Posted by Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
tthanks for the answers .
Yes work very good using cdi 2.0 .
I just thought that the cdi 2.0 is default in 1.9.1
--
*Daniel Dias dos Santos*
Java Developer
SouJava & JCP Member
GitHub: https://github.com/Daniel-Dos
Linkedin: www.linkedin.com/in/danieldiasjava
Twitter: http://twitter.com/danieldiasjava
Em qui, 29 de ago de 2019 às 07:02, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.invalid>
escreveu:
> +1
>
> There was really no need to support any feature after 1.0.
> We have a few things we call via reflection though.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> > Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0
> >
> > Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> schrieb am
> Mi.,
> > 28. Aug. 2019, 21:24:
> >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
> > >
> > > Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
>
>
Re: Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
+1
There was really no need to support any feature after 1.0.
We have a few things we call via reflection though.
LieGrue,
strub
Am Mittwoch, den 28.08.2019, 21:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Andraschko:
> Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0
>
> Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi.,
> 28. Aug. 2019, 21:24:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
> >
> > Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
Re: Doubt about CDI 2.0 in Deltaspike
Posted by Thomas Andraschko <an...@gmail.com>.
Probably 1.0, but we are compatible with 2.0
Daniel Dias Dos Santos <da...@gmail.com> schrieb am Mi.,
28. Aug. 2019, 21:24:
> Hello,
>
> I have an doubt about version of CDI in project.
>
> Currently which version the CDI the deltaspike 1.9.1 that use ?
>
> Thanks.
>