You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> on 2002/07/23 23:45:15 UTC
Subversion 'Alpha' released
Gentle coders,
The ever-growing cadre of Subversion developers is proud to announce
the release of Subversion "Alpha" (0.14.0).
Since we became self-hosting eleven months ago, we've gone through ten
milestones. This milestone, however, is the one we've always been
working towards; it's a freeze on major features for our 1.0 release.
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by an...@gnulinux.dk.
When I tried to upgrade my client I hit a compile bug.
My system is a standard linux (Gentoo). Gcc 2.95.3
I updated apr, apr-util and neon. Then ran sh autogen.sh:
buildcheck: autoconf version 2.53 (ok)
buildcheck: libtool version 1.4.1 (ok)
I captured the complete configure here:
http://www.gnulinux.dk/svn-configure.log
and the compile log here:
http://www.gnulinux.dk/svn-compile.log
The part where it fails is:
../../../subversion/libsvn_ra/.libs/libsvn_ra-1.a(ra_loader.o): In
function load_ra_module':
/film/kernel/subversion/subversion/libsvn_ra/ra_loader.c(.rodata+0x4):
undefined reference to svn_ra_dav_init'
I'm trying to compile 2671.
I only get this when trying to compile with --disable-shared
* Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> [2002-07-24 01:46:19]:
>
> <announce>
--
Anders Rune Jensen
jabber: superduck@myjabber.net | email : anders@gnulinux.dk
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu>.
Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Developer-visible changes:
> * UTF-8 changes
> - all libraries now assume UTF-8 input paths and log msgs
> - many apr calls are now abstracted into new svn_io_* wrappers
> * fs schema change
> - cache each revision's changed-paths in a new 'changes' table
> - another repository dump/load is required
> * a number of fs-dumper bugfixes and redesigns
> * test suite is now all python, so it can run on win32
>
I don't know where that misconception came from. We're still using the
xml tests, svn-test.sh and svn-test2.sh. I agree we should rewrite them,
though.
> * reduce huge memory consumption of mod_dav_svn during checkouts
> * memory optimizations for prop-reading and 'svn diff'
> * bugfixes for commit-email.pl and tweak-log.cgi
> * lots of branch work on the delta-combiner and on libsvn_wc rewrite
> * numerous bugfixes: 'svn merge .' bug (#748), bug #764, two new
> ghudson-dirversioning bugs, #756, #675, #783, #796, wc-root bugs,
> #799, #800, #797, directory-removal bugs (#611, #687)
>
>
--
Brane Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 04:41:53PM -0400, mark benedetto king wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:33:12PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> > Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > > I think the only reason we haven't deleted /tags yet, is because of
> > > > demonstration purposes. :-) It's a nice example of layout.
> >
> > > if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> > > with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> > > tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
> >
>
> In the spirit of SVN advocacy, I think we should showcase the O(1)
> tagging, instead.
oops, how embarassing...
that'll teach me to read my posts before i send them...
-garrett
--
garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes
http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by mark benedetto king <bk...@inquira.com>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:33:12PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> ...
>
> > > I think the only reason we haven't deleted /tags yet, is because of
> > > demonstration purposes. :-) It's a nice example of layout.
>
> > if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> > with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> > tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
>
In the spirit of SVN advocacy, I think we should showcase the O(1)
tagging, instead.
--ben
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:33:12PM -0500, B. W. Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> ...
>
> > > I think the only reason we haven't deleted /tags yet, is because of
> > > demonstration purposes. :-) It's a nice example of layout.
>
> > if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> > with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> > tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
>
> ...
>
> > would anyone have any objection to this? any reason we shouldn't go
> > back and retroactively tag all the revisions we released as tarballs
> > and continue doing so in the future?
>
> +1 This would be a *very* nice showcase of how you could use tags.
well, i've gone back and tagged everything back to 0.6 (the first
release we gave a version number to). if we could continue to tag
each new release as we make them, i think it would (as fitz says)
provide a good example of how one can use tags for our user community.
-garrett
--
garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes
http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 01:37:56AM +0200, Josef Wolf wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 03:30:46PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> > all right, i'll make the tags tonight when i get home, assuming nobody
> > beats me to it.
>
> Well, but what about
>
> repos/svn/tags/alpha
> repos/svn/branches/alpha
>
> and some commits to repos/svn/branches/alpha. Just to show people how
> to do it...
well, we have a tags/0.14.0, which is the alpha release. i went with
the version number rather than the name. and we don't need a branch
for alpha because we don't plan to port any changes back to it.
if people want examples of how to use branches, we have more than
enough in our /branches already. there's no reason to go creating
more that won't serve any purpose.
-garrett
--
garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes
http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Josef Wolf <jw...@raven.inka.de>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 03:30:46PM -0400, Garrett Rooney wrote:
> all right, i'll make the tags tonight when i get home, assuming nobody
> beats me to it.
Well, but what about
repos/svn/tags/alpha
repos/svn/branches/alpha
and some commits to repos/svn/branches/alpha. Just to show people how
to do it...
--
-- Josef Wolf -- jw@raven.inka.de --
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:23:23PM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
>
> > if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> > with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> > tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
>
> It might be a nice 'showcase' of our milestones, I guess.
exactly.
> > would anyone have any objection to this? any reason we shouldn't go
> > back and retroactively tag all the revisions we released as tarballs
> > and continue doing so in the future?
>
> Hey, if you want to go make 10 tags or so, go for it. It's all in the
> CHANGES file. I wouldn't object.
all right, i'll make the tags tonight when i get home, assuming nobody
beats me to it.
-garrett
--
garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes
http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
> with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
> tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
It might be a nice 'showcase' of our milestones, I guess.
> plus it would be nice to be able to browse the various different
> releases from the web, and until viewsvn comes to fruition there is no
> way to go back to previous revisions without downloading them.
Heh, unless you know the Secret Magic URI format, you can only browse
the head revision right now. :-)
> would anyone have any objection to this? any reason we shouldn't go
> back and retroactively tag all the revisions we released as tarballs
> and continue doing so in the future?
Hey, if you want to go make 10 tags or so, go for it. It's all in the
CHANGES file. I wouldn't object.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Garrett Rooney <ro...@electricjellyfish.net>.
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 07:13:18AM -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Féliciano Matias <fe...@free.fr> writes:
>
> > Le mer 24/07/2002 à 01:45, Ben Collins-Sussman a écrit :
> > >
> > > Gentle coders,
> > >
> > > The ever-growing cadre of Subversion developers is proud to announce
> > > the release of Subversion "Alpha" (0.14.0).
> > >
> >
> > Great.
> >
> > But why you don't add http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.14/ , at
> > least for demonstration purpose.
>
>
> Well, we don't really use our /tags directory. Our CHANGES file tells
> us which revision of /trunk is 0.14. But that's just the way we run
> our project.
>
> I think the only reason we haven't deleted /tags yet, is because of
> demonstration purposes. :-) It's a nice example of layout.
if we're going to keep it around, i'd be in favor of populating it
with the various releases... i mean we've got this wonderful O(N)
tagging feature, we might as well use it ;-)
plus it would be nice to be able to browse the various different
releases from the web, and until viewsvn comes to fruition there is no
way to go back to previous revisions without downloading them.
would anyone have any objection to this? any reason we shouldn't go
back and retroactively tag all the revisions we released as tarballs
and continue doing so in the future?
-garrett
--
garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes
http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net>.
Féliciano Matias <fe...@free.fr> writes:
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by Féliciano Matias <fe...@free.fr>.
Le mer 24/07/2002 à 01:45, Ben Collins-Sussman a écrit :
>
> Gentle coders,
>
> The ever-growing cadre of Subversion developers is proud to announce
> the release of Subversion "Alpha" (0.14.0).
>
Great.
But why you don't add http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/tags/0.14/ , at
least for demonstration purpose.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Subversion 'Alpha' released
Posted by "Glenn A. Thompson" <gt...@cdr.net>.
Congrats Folks!!!
I hoist my fresh pot of coffee. I hope you guys are hoisting something with a
little more kick:-)
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org