You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@groovy.apache.org by gi...@apache.org on 2020/09/26 22:55:36 UTC

[groovy-dev-site] branch asf-site updated: 2020/09/26 22:55:31: Generated dev website from groovy-website@3fa9576

This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.

git-site-role pushed a commit to branch asf-site
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/groovy-dev-site.git


The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/asf-site by this push:
     new 3ad920d  2020/09/26 22:55:31: Generated dev website from groovy-website@3fa9576
3ad920d is described below

commit 3ad920dcebfb04db26aa69650c9d521e32ba8e69
Author: jenkins <bu...@apache.org>
AuthorDate: Sat Sep 26 22:55:31 2020 +0000

    2020/09/26 22:55:31: Generated dev website from groovy-website@3fa9576
---
 wiki/groovy-release-discussion.html | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/wiki/groovy-release-discussion.html b/wiki/groovy-release-discussion.html
index ba87ee6..b5d33c2 100644
--- a/wiki/groovy-release-discussion.html
+++ b/wiki/groovy-release-discussion.html
@@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ Many of the ideas went into Groovy&#8217;s current release process which involve
 </ul>
 </div>
 <div class="paragraph">
-<p><em>We need to add the <strong>DISCLAIMER</strong>. The "incubating" part is disturbing. In particular, Groovy is not a new project. It&#8217;s been there for 12 years, and the last release before Apache will be 2.4.2. Does it mean that the next release will have to be named 2.4.3-incubating? It will be very disturbing for our users, and it sounds pretty bad, just as if Groovy wasn&#8217;t production ready. Should we do this, then the incubation phase should be shortened as much as po [...]
+<p><em>We need to add the <strong>DISCLAIMER</strong>. The "incubating" part is disturbing. In particular, Groovy is not a new project. It has been around for 12+ years, and the last release before Apache will be 2.4.2. Does it mean that the next release will have to be named 2.4.3-incubating? It will be very disturbing for our users, and it sounds pretty bad, just as if Groovy wasn&#8217;t production ready. Should we do this, then the incubation phase should be shortened as much as poss [...]
 </div>
 <div class="ulist">
 <ul>