You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Myrna van Lunteren (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/17 00:06:26 UTC
[jira] Reopened: (DERBY-2526) Wrong results with queries that use
the JOIN ... ON syntax to join with views or other non-base table
expressions.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2526?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Myrna van Lunteren reopened DERBY-2526:
---------------------------------------
> Wrong results with queries that use the JOIN ... ON syntax to join with views or other non-base table expressions.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-2526
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2526
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: SQL
> Affects Versions: 10.0.2.1, 10.1.3.1, 10.2.2.0, 10.3.0.0
> Reporter: Bryan Pendleton
> Assignee: A B
> Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
> Attachments: badQuery.log, d2526_v1.html, d2526_v1.patch, d2526_v2.patch, d2526_v2.stat, derby-2526.sql, DistinctTestNotes.txt, firstTryPatch.diff, goodQuery.log, releaseNote.html, releaseNote.html
>
>
> I think both select statements in the attached repro script should return 1 row, but in fact the first statement returns 1 row and the second returns zero rows.
> The only difference between the two statements is that the columns in the UNION view are listed in a different order (bvw vs. bvw2).
> This seems like a bug to me; the order of the columns in the view definition shouldn't matter, should it?
> As Army noted on the derby-dev list, the fact that this reproduces with 10.0 means that it is not caused by some of the 10.2 optimizer changes. Something else is going wrong.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.