You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to java-dev@axis.apache.org by Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> on 2005/08/29 22:50:02 UTC
VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we
are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source
trees.
Here is my: +1
--
Tom Jordahl
Macromedia Server Development
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 8/29/05, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
>
>
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis
> 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are
> marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source
> trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
+1, at least for record
On 8/30/05, Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Samisa...
>
> On 8/30/05, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
> >
> > I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
> >
> > I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source trees.
> >
> > Here is my: +1
> >
> > --
> >
> > Tom Jordahl
> >
> > Macromedia Server Development
> >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Srinath Perera <he...@gmail.com>.
+1, at least for record
On 8/30/05, Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Samisa...
>
> On 8/30/05, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
> >
> > I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
> >
> > I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source trees.
> >
> > Here is my: +1
> >
> > --
> >
> > Tom Jordahl
> >
> > Macromedia Server Development
> >
> >
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Samisa Abeysinghe <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
Samisa...
On 8/30/05, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
>
>
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>.
+1
- Dennis
Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
> Axis 1.x named “axis”, not “axis1”.
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named “axis2”, especially since
> we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our
> source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
+1 for sure.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 16:50 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
> Axis 1.x named “axis”, not “axis1”.
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named “axis2”, especially since
> we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our
> source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Ian Springer <ip...@apache.org>.
+1
Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
> Axis 1.x named “axis”, not “axis1”.
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named “axis2”, especially since
> we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our
> source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Davanum Srinivas <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 from me.
-- dims
On 8/29/05, Tom Jordahl <to...@macromedia.com> wrote:
>
>
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for Axis
> 1.x named "axis", not "axis1".
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named "axis2", especially since we are
> marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our source
> trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
>
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/ - Oxygenating The Web Service Platform
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Sanjiva Weerawarana <sa...@opensource.lk>.
+1 for sure.
Sanjiva.
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 16:50 -0400, Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
> Axis 1.x named “axis”, not “axis1”.
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named “axis2”, especially since
> we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our
> source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>
Re: VOTE: Name axis 1.x SVN tree "axis" and axis2 tree "axis2"
Posted by Dennis Sosnoski <dm...@sosnoski.com>.
+1
- Dennis
Tom Jordahl wrote:
> I would very much like the SVN tree to have the Java and C++ trees for
> Axis 1.x named “axis”, not “axis1”.
>
> I also feel the Axis2 tree should be named “axis2”, especially since
> we are marking Axis2 with revision numbers like .9 and (I assume) 1.0.
>
> I believe this is the most clear and concise way to organize our
> source trees.
>
> Here is my: +1
>
> --
>
> Tom Jordahl
>
> Macromedia Server Development
>