Re: Why Phoenix creates an extra CF named as "0"

[anil gupta <an...@gmail.com>]

Hi James,

Due to a typo we forgot to put CF name as prefix to CQ name in 1/1100
column of that table. That led to creation of CF with name "0". After
fixing the typo, we only have 2 CF.

Thanks,
Anil Gupta

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:20 AM, James Taylor <ja...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hi Anil,
> Please post your CREATE TABLE and CREATE INDEX statement.
> Thanks,
> James
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:06 AM, anil gupta <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a phoenix table, in that table we defined 2CF. I have one global
>> secondary index in this table.
>> We also see a 3rd named as "0". Why does phoenix creates this extra CF?
>> Is there a way to avoid having this extra cf?
>> If we remove it, what features we are gonna loose?
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Anil Gupta
>>
>
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Anil Gupta