[jira] Commented: (SOLR-705) Distributed search should optionally return docID->shard map

["Shalin Shekhar Mangar (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-705?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12683774#action_12683774 ] 

Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-705:
--------------------------------------------

bq. Sooooo....what do people think of "meta"? It seems like it could make things easier on clients - removing the need for correlation-by-id.

I'm +1 on the idea. Let's choose a better name than 'meta' with less likelihood of collision, say '_meta_'?

> Distributed search should optionally return docID->shard map
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-705
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-705
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 1.3
>         Environment: all
>            Reporter: Brian Whitman
>             Fix For: 1.4
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch, SOLR-705.patch
>
>
> SOLR-303 queries with &shards parameters set need to return the dociD->shard mapping in the response. Without it, updating/deleting documents when the # of shards is variable is hard. We currently set this with a special requestHandler that filters /update and inserts the shard as a field in the index but it would be better if the shard location came back in the query response outside of the index.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.