Re: Networked brokers and durable bridges

[Paul Boyes <pa...@paulboyes.com>]

Did you ever figure out what is going on?  I am experiencing this as well.

Thanks,

Paul


Bidimus wrote:
> 
> I'm working with a configuration of three networked brokers each with a
> bridge to the other two.  The purpose is to provide redundancy as well as
> load balancing.
> 
> It works as expected for Queues and non-durable topic subscriptions.
> 
> Durable topic subscriptions though seem to be exhibiting a problem and I'm
> not sure if it's the release I'm using or a configuration problem.  When a
> durable subscription is made, durable subscriptions are made across the
> bridge on the other two brokers.  When the durable subscription is
> destroyed though, the two durable bridges aren't destroyed with it.
> 
> I'm currently running the 5.0 snapshot from 10-23-2007.  This is necessary
> as I've found leaks and other issues with all of the 4.x releases.
> 
> My configurations look esentially like this:
> 
>    <transportConnectors>
>        <!-- <transportConnector name="openwire"
> uri="tcp://localhost:61616" discoveryUri="multicast://default"/> -->
>        <transportConnector name="openwire" uri="tcp://localhost:61618" />
>     </transportConnectors>
> 
>     <!-- The store and forward broker networks ActiveMQ will listen to -->
>     <networkConnectors>
>       <networkConnector name="bridge"
> uri="static://(tcp://localhost:61617,tcp://localhost:61616)"
> dynamicOnly="true" networkTTL="1" />
>     </networkConnectors> 
> 
> With port numbers and broker names changed on each broker.
> 
> Topics and subscriptions are made by the clients at run time.
> 
> If this is expected behavior then is there a workaround for this scenario?
> 
> Thanks in advance,
> 
> - Jim
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Networked-brokers-and-durable-bridges-tf4693602s2354.html#a13828107
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.