You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@weex.apache.org by 余星 <64...@qq.com> on 2017/04/14 03:08:27 UTC
回复： [VOTE] Release of Apache Weex (incubating) 0.12.0-RC0
是在android 情况下的。
https://segmentfault.com/q/1010000009063524
apache 这个提问方式不熟悉，不知道怎么弄，在segmentfault也提了个问题
------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
发件人: "sospartan"<so...@gmail.com>;
发送时间: 2017年4月14日(星期五) 中午11:05
收件人: "dev"<de...@weex.incubator.apache.org>;
主题: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Weex (incubating) 0.12.0-RC0
I've review all major source code and replace with apache src-header：
android .java file under 'android'
ios .m & .h file under 'ios'
html5 .js file under 'html5'
I'll create JIRA issues to follow up these problems.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org> wrote:
> -1 ( VETO - dependency on GPL code)
>
>
> The NOTICE file contains notices about 5 dependencies, but the list of
> dependencies in package.json is much bigger, and I would assume that most
> of them are released under a license that requires attribution.
>
> Also, what is the relationship with the weex-* dependencies? Looking at
> weex-picker, it doesn't seem to be released with the same rigor as is
> expected from Apache projects, such as not stating the license terms and
> not respecting notices of dependencies.
>
> Why are these projects not part of Apache Weex (incubating)?
>
> Furthermore, it is not only .java files that are expected to have the
> license headers. We expect that in every source file that allows for
> comments. And it is missing all over the place, such as javascripts, XML
> files, build files, shell script files and so on.
>
> In the incubator-weex-1f7ed88/flow-typed/npm directory, which is some type
> of "replacements" for other things. What is this, because some of those
> stubs are for GPL'd code, so I want to have a clear understanding of what
> is going on here...
>
>
> HOLD THE PRESSES; animationjs is listed in package.json as a dependency,
> and used in html5/render/browser/extend/components/slider/carrousel.js.
> This is GPL'd code and is viral, meaning that Weex is REQUIRED to be GPL'd
> as well, which ASF don't allow.
>
> What disturbs me right now, because this is the second thing I picked at
> random. SO how many more unacceptable dependencies do we have in Weex,
> especially considering the transitive dependencies via the weexteam/weex-*
> projects?
>
>
> So, this RC CAN NOT BE RELEASED, and I will block until a full review of
> all dependencies have been done (and if I am doing the review, it will take
> months)
>
>
> Niclas
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:24 PM, sospartan <so...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Weex PPMC,
> >
> > I'm calling this vote to release Apache Weex 0.12.0-RC0.
> >
> > The tag to be voted upon:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-weex.git
> > ;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.12.0-rc0
> >
> > The commit hash:
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-weex.git
> > ;a=commit;h=1f7ed8880cf0938ba079b57aa2dc46ee484983d2
> >
> > The source tarball can be found at:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/0.12.0
> > -incubating/RC0/
> >
> > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > 97B9 6598 A6A3 B63C 53BD 77E9 44C5 2286 22B9 7784
> >
> > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/KEYS
> >
> > Release note about this version:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEEX-26
> >
> > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > Please vote on releasing this RC.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards!
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > sospartan
> > https://weex-project.io
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
>
--
sospartan
Phone:13588488290
HangZhou
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Weex (incubating) 0.12.0-RC0
Posted by sospartan <so...@apache.org>.
Dear 余星,
Pls use english to join discuss in this mail list.
If you want feedback a problem, pls start a new thread.
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 11:08 AM, 余星 <64...@qq.com> wrote:
> 是在android 情况下的。
> https://segmentfault.com/q/1010000009063524
> apache 这个提问方式不熟悉，不知道怎么弄，在segmentfault也提了个问题
>
>
>
>
> ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------
> 发件人: "sospartan"<so...@gmail.com>;
> 发送时间: 2017年4月14日(星期五) 中午11:05
> 收件人: "dev"<de...@weex.incubator.apache.org>;
> 主题: Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Weex (incubating) 0.12.0-RC0
>
>
>
> I've review all major source code and replace with apache src-header：
> android .java file under 'android'
> ios .m & .h file under 'ios'
> html5 .js file under 'html5'
>
> I'll create JIRA issues to follow up these problems.
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Niclas Hedhman <ni...@hedhman.org>
> wrote:
>
> > -1 ( VETO - dependency on GPL code)
> >
> >
> > The NOTICE file contains notices about 5 dependencies, but the list of
> > dependencies in package.json is much bigger, and I would assume that most
> > of them are released under a license that requires attribution.
> >
> > Also, what is the relationship with the weex-* dependencies? Looking at
> > weex-picker, it doesn't seem to be released with the same rigor as is
> > expected from Apache projects, such as not stating the license terms and
> > not respecting notices of dependencies.
> >
> > Why are these projects not part of Apache Weex (incubating)?
> >
> > Furthermore, it is not only .java files that are expected to have the
> > license headers. We expect that in every source file that allows for
> > comments. And it is missing all over the place, such as javascripts, XML
> > files, build files, shell script files and so on.
> >
> > In the incubator-weex-1f7ed88/flow-typed/npm directory, which is some
> type
> > of "replacements" for other things. What is this, because some of those
> > stubs are for GPL'd code, so I want to have a clear understanding of what
> > is going on here...
> >
> >
> > HOLD THE PRESSES; animationjs is listed in package.json as a dependency,
> > and used in html5/render/browser/extend/components/slider/carrousel.js.
> > This is GPL'd code and is viral, meaning that Weex is REQUIRED to be
> GPL'd
> > as well, which ASF don't allow.
> >
> > What disturbs me right now, because this is the second thing I picked at
> > random. SO how many more unacceptable dependencies do we have in Weex,
> > especially considering the transitive dependencies via the
> weexteam/weex-*
> > projects?
> >
> >
> > So, this RC CAN NOT BE RELEASED, and I will block until a full review of
> > all dependencies have been done (and if I am doing the review, it will
> take
> > months)
> >
> >
> > Niclas
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 6:24 PM, sospartan <so...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Weex PPMC,
> > >
> > > I'm calling this vote to release Apache Weex 0.12.0-RC0.
> > >
> > > The tag to be voted upon:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-weex.git
> > > ;a=shortlog;h=refs/tags/0.12.0-rc0
> > >
> > > The commit hash:
> > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-weex.git
> > > ;a=commit;h=1f7ed8880cf0938ba079b57aa2dc46ee484983d2
> > >
> > > The source tarball can be found at:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/0.12.0
> > > -incubating/RC0/
> > >
> > > The fingerprint of key to sign release artifacts:
> > > 97B9 6598 A6A3 B63C 53BD 77E9 44C5 2286 22B9 7784
> > >
> > > Release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/weex/KEYS
> > >
> > > Release note about this version:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WEEX-26
> > >
> > > This vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > Please vote on releasing this RC.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 approve
> > > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Best Regards!
> > > ------------------------------
> > >
> > > sospartan
> > > https://weex-project.io
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer
> > http://polygene.apache.org - New Energy for Java
> >
>
>
>
> --
> sospartan
> Phone:13588488290
> HangZhou
>
--
Best Regards!
------------------------------
sospartan
https://weex-project.io