You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "A B (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/04/22 02:14:15 UTC

[jira] Resolved: (DERBY-2488) When loaded by jvm1.6 - EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource is not returning a JDBC 4 compliant PooledConnection object

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

A B resolved DERBY-2488.
------------------------

       Resolution: Fixed
    Fix Version/s: 10.3.0.0
       Derby Info:   (was: [Patch Available])

derbyall and suites.All both ran cleanly for me after a full sync / clobber / rebuild.  So I removed an extraneous import from the _v4 patch and committed with svn # 531129:

  URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=531129

Marking the issue as resolved.  Thanks again to Dan for his input on how to best fix this.

> When loaded by jvm1.6 - EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource is not returning a JDBC 4 compliant PooledConnection object
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-2488
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-2488
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JDBC
>    Affects Versions: 10.2.2.0
>         Environment: Run test using JVM 1.6
>            Reporter: Stan Bradbury
>         Assigned To: A B
>             Fix For: 10.3.0.0
>
>         Attachments: d2488_notTested_v1.patch, d2488_v2.patch, d2488_v3.patch, d2488_v3.stat, d2488_v4.patch, showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.class, showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.class, showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.java, showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.java
>
>
> Updated the problem description to reflect the actual issue [Stan 4/5/07]:  EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource is not returning a JDBC 4 compliant PooledConnection object
> When loaded using JVM 1.6 the JDBC 3.0 data source (org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource) is reporting a JDBC spec compliance level of 4.  The DatabaseMetaData.getJDBCMajorVersion method should return the
> correct spec compliance level (3) for the JDBC 3.0 data source.  The application server that relies on the reported spec compliance level to determine if a statement event listener should be registered will encounter a failure when  attemptting to register  an event listener with the JDBC 3.0 driver.
> Note that the JDBC 4.0 metadata call ..getMetaData().supportsStoredFunctionsUsingCallSyntax() is executed by the JDBC 3.0 driver.  This doesn't bother me but seems curious that this is supported by a JDBC 3.0 driver.
> Attached is a test case based on the test code from DERBY-8862 (JDBC 4 driver reports incorrect spec complieance level).
> Running the test:
> set JAVA_HOME to a 1.6 JVM
> Compile program
> run command:   ${JAVA_HOME}/java showJDBCdsMetaDataLis <path-to-database> 3.0 
> Using JAVA 6.0
> > "%JAVA_HOME%\bin\java" showJDBCdsMetaDataLis "c:\tstdb102" 3.0
>  . . JDBC 3 or less: Using jdbc.EmbeddedConnectionPoolDataSource
> Database product: Apache Derby
> Database version: 10.2.2.0 - (485682)
> Driver name:      Apache Derby Embedded JDBC Driver
> Driver version:   10.2.2.0 - (485682)
> JDBC driver major version: 4
> JDBC driver minor version: 0
> JDBC 4.0 metaData - SFusingCall: true
>  >> exception thrown:
> A non SQL error occured.
> java.lang.AbstractMethodError: org.apache.derby.jdbc.EmbedPooledConnection.addStatementEventListener(Ljavax/sql/Statemen
> tEventListener;)V
>         at showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.main(showJDBCdsMetaDataLis.java:103)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.