You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Davide Giannella <da...@apache.org> on 2017/10/18 10:12:31 UTC
Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Hello team,
I took the time to crunch in some dates and here's a proposal for our
next stable releases:
# 27th November
Branch and Release Jackrabbit 2.16.0
# 5th December
Update Oak 1.7.x to Jackrabbit 2.16.0. This will give us maximum
coverage on the usage of this specific version in Oak based on our
current unstable release cycle
# 21st December
Release Oak 1.7.14. This will technically be our latest unstable cut as
there's the winter break in the middle and we won't have full coverage
from all of us
# 15th January
Branch and Release Oak 1.8.0 (or 2.0.0 see other thread).
After each stable release the effort should therefore move on the
stabilisation of the stable release branches of which we'll go for
releases on demand basis depending on what/if fixed. No more unstable
cut for now.
# Somewhere in the future
Resume of the unstable cuts: JR 2.17.x, Oak 1.9.x (or 2.1.x)
If there are any objections please reply. I've already updated the Oak
jira version dates to the above plan.
Cheers
Davide
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Marcel Reutegger <mr...@adobe.com.INVALID>.
On 06/12/17 12:14, Davide Giannella wrote:
> #8th Dec: Branch and Release Oak 1.8.0
that should probably read 8th of January, unless you'll find a way
traveling back in time ;)
Regards
Marcel
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-12-06 12:17, Davide Giannella wrote:
> On 06/12/2017 11:14, Davide Giannella wrote:
>> #21st Dec: Release Oak 1.7.13
> Apologies for the noise. My bad.
>
> 18th December.
>
> D.
Cut Dec 18, release Dec 21, I assume?
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Davide Giannella <da...@apache.org>.
On 06/12/2017 11:14, Davide Giannella wrote:
> #21st Dec: Release Oak 1.7.13
Apologies for the noise. My bad.
18th December.
D.
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Davide Giannella <da...@apache.org>.
On 18/10/2017 11:12, Davide Giannella wrote:
> # 21st December
>
> Release Oak 1.7.14. This will technically be our latest unstable cut as
> there's the winter break in the middle and we won't have full coverage
> from all of us
>
> # 15th January
>
> Branch and Release Oak 1.8.0 (or 2.0.0 see other thread).
>
> After each stable release the effort should therefore move on the
> stabilisation of the stable release branches of which we'll go for
> releases on demand basis depending on what/if fixed. No more unstable
> cut for now.
Slight change of plans as we skipped a load.
#21st Dec: Release Oak 1.7.13
#8th Dec: Branch and Release Oak 1.8.0
Any concerns please speak up.
Cheers
Davide
Re: Branching Jackrabbit 2.16, was: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16)
stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-11-16 08:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> I just did a "final" 2.15 release (2.15.8), and I'm planning to branch
> 2.16 on Monday.
>
> If there are any concerns with that, please raise them now.
> ...
Jackrabbit 2.16 is now branched; I will now start work on the first
release (2.16.0).
Best regards, Julian
Re: Branching Jackrabbit 2.16, was: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16)
stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-11-16 08:33, Julian Reschke wrote:
> ...
> I just did a "final" 2.15 release (2.15.8), and I'm planning to branch
> 2.16 on Monday.
>
> If there are any concerns with that, please raise them now.
> ...
Jackrabbit 2.16 is now branched; I will now start work on the first
release (2.16.0).
Best regards, Julian
Branching Jackrabbit 2.16, was: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16)
stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-10-18 13:09, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Sounds good to me in general.
>
> One thought however on...:
>
> On 2017-10-18 12:12, Davide Giannella wrote:
>> Hello team,
>>
>> I took the time to crunch in some dates and here's a proposal for our
>> next stable releases:
>>
>> # 27th November
>>
>> Branch and Release Jackrabbit 2.16.0
>> ...
>
> As we aren't doing any new feature work in Jackrabbit anyway (*), I
> might do the branch for 2.16 a bit earlier (maybe the week before).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> (*) Or does anybody have changes in mind that need to go into 2.16?
I just did a "final" 2.15 release (2.15.8), and I'm planning to branch
2.16 on Monday.
If there are any concerns with that, please raise them now.
Best regards, Julian
Branching Jackrabbit 2.16, was: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16)
stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
On 2017-10-18 13:09, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Sounds good to me in general.
>
> One thought however on...:
>
> On 2017-10-18 12:12, Davide Giannella wrote:
>> Hello team,
>>
>> I took the time to crunch in some dates and here's a proposal for our
>> next stable releases:
>>
>> # 27th November
>>
>> Branch and Release Jackrabbit 2.16.0
>> ...
>
> As we aren't doing any new feature work in Jackrabbit anyway (*), I
> might do the branch for 2.16 a bit earlier (maybe the week before).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>
> (*) Or does anybody have changes in mind that need to go into 2.16?
I just did a "final" 2.15 release (2.15.8), and I'm planning to branch
2.16 on Monday.
If there are any concerns with that, please raise them now.
Best regards, Julian
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
Sounds good to me in general.
One thought however on...:
On 2017-10-18 12:12, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I took the time to crunch in some dates and here's a proposal for our
> next stable releases:
>
> # 27th November
>
> Branch and Release Jackrabbit 2.16.0
> ...
As we aren't doing any new feature work in Jackrabbit anyway (*), I
might do the branch for 2.16 a bit earlier (maybe the week before).
Best regards, Julian
(*) Or does anybody have changes in mind that need to go into 2.16?
Re: Oak (1.8) and Jackrabbit (2.16) stable releases plan
Posted by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>.
Sounds good to me in general.
One thought however on...:
On 2017-10-18 12:12, Davide Giannella wrote:
> Hello team,
>
> I took the time to crunch in some dates and here's a proposal for our
> next stable releases:
>
> # 27th November
>
> Branch and Release Jackrabbit 2.16.0
> ...
As we aren't doing any new feature work in Jackrabbit anyway (*), I
might do the branch for 2.16 a bit earlier (maybe the week before).
Best regards, Julian
(*) Or does anybody have changes in mind that need to go into 2.16?